Q27, run 2026-11-04-2024-sonnet-query

← back to the run

How is Corvenia Power's 2032 note rated?

Tests: Instrument versus issuer: the subordinated note sits below the issuer.

Expected: rating = A-

✅ D1 sql run 1 graded by code · query session

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D1 sql run 2 graded by code · query session

A-. I06 is rated A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D1 sql run 3 graded by code · query session

A-. I06 has had a single rating, A42.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 1 graded by code · query session

A- (I06, A42, subordinated).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 2 graded by code · query session

A- (A42). I06 is subordinated, and the issuer's FC rating of A is not the instrument rating.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 3 graded by code · query session

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D4 sparql run 1 graded by code · query session

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D4 sparql run 2 graded by code · query session

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D4 sparql run 3 graded by code · query session

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 1 graded by code · query session

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 2 graded by code · query session

A-. I06 was assigned A- by A42, and nothing later changes it.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 3 graded by code · query session

A- (I06).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 1 graded by code · query session

A- (A42, instrument I06).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 2 graded by code · query session

A- (I06, A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 3 graded by code · query session

A- (A42, I06).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 1 graded by code · query session

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 2 graded by code · query session

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 3 graded by code · query session

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}