Q39, run 2026-11-05-1515-sonnet-query

← back to the run

What is Northwind Holdings' current rating?

Tests: Identity: the latest action sits on the other record.

Expected: rating = A

✅ D1 sql run 1 graded by code · query session

A. E02 is rated A (A08), and E03's A (A09, Positive outlook) is the same entity.

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D1 sql run 2 graded by code · query session

A (A08/A09).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D1 sql run 3 graded by code · query session

A. A09 affirmed A on 2025-09-15, after A08 assigned A.

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D1 sql run 4 graded by code · query session

A. E02 is still at A with no later change.

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D1 sql run 5 graded by code · query session

A, with a positive outlook.

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 1 graded by code · query session

A.

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 2 graded by code · query session

A, per A09 on E03 (same LEI as E02).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 3 graded by code · query session

A (A09).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 4 graded by code · query session

A, from A08 and A09. The Positive outlook does not change the rating.

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 5 graded by code · query session

A (A09, for the merged E02/E03 entity).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D4 sparql run 1 graded by code · query session

A, per the E02/E03 records (same LEI). The latest action is A09 on 2025-09-15, an affirmation of A.

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D4 sparql run 2 graded by code · query session

A, from E03's A09 on 2025-09-15, which is later than E02's A (A08).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

❌ D4 sparql run 3 graded by code · query session

A- (A08).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

Why: rating: expected A, got A-

✅ D4 sparql run 4 graded by code · query session

A (A08/A09, same LEI).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D4 sparql run 5 graded by code · query session

A. E02 and E03 are the same entity, and the latest rating is A.

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 1 graded by code · query session

A. The E02 and E03 records agree on A.

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 2 graded by code · query session

A. This is the same record chain as Q4.

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 3 graded by code · query session

A (A09).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 4 graded by code · query session

A, with a Positive outlook (A09).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 5 graded by code · query session

A (A08, A09).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 1 graded by code · query session

A.

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 2 graded by code · query session

A (A09).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 3 graded by code · query session

A (A09).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 4 graded by code · query session

A. This is E02's current LTIDR.

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 5 graded by code · query session

A (A09).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 1 graded by code · query session

A (A09).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 2 graded by code · query session

A (A09).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 3 graded by code · query session

A (A09).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 4 graded by code · query session

A (A09).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 5 graded by code · query session

A (A09).

JSON: {"rating": "A"}