Q33, run 2026-11-05-1515-sonnet-query

← back to the run

Whose credit risk does a holder of the Halden Leasing 2028 notes take, and how is it rated?

Tests: Roles: the guarantor is the parent, not the ultimate parent.

Expected: risk_of = E10 rating = BBB+

✅ D1 sql run 1 graded by code · query session

Halden Bank (E10), the guarantor of I05, whose rating is BBB+. I05 itself was downgraded to BBB+ in A29.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D1 sql run 2 graded by code · query session

The guarantor, Halden Bank (E10). I05 is guaranteed by E10 and rated BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D1 sql run 3 graded by code · query session

The risk is Halden Bank (E10), rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10, and A27 downgraded E10 to BBB+.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D1 sql run 4 graded by code · query session

The holder takes the credit risk of E10, the guarantor of I05, currently rated BBB+ (A27).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D1 sql run 5 graded by code · query session

E10 (Halden Bank), rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10, which A27 downgraded to BBB+ on 2026-04-15.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 1 graded by code · query session

Halden Bank (E10). It guarantees I05, which is rated BBB+ after A29, in line with E10's own BBB+.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 2 graded by code · query session

The holder takes the credit risk of E10, Halden Bank, rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10, and A27 downgraded it to BBB+.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 3 graded by code · query session

Halden Bank (E10), rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10, whose latest rating is BBB+ (A27).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 4 graded by code · query session

The holder takes E10's credit risk, rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10, and E10's latest rating is BBB+ (A27).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 5 graded by code · query session

The holder takes Halden Bank's credit risk (E10), rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10, and both E10 (A27) and I05 (A29) are BBB+.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D4 sparql run 1 graded by code · query session

Halden Bank (E10), rated BBB+. I05 is issued by E11 and guaranteed by E10, and I05 itself is rated BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D4 sparql run 2 graded by code · query session

E10, rated BBB+. I05 is issued by E11 and guaranteed by E10, which was downgraded to BBB+ on 2026-04-15.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D4 sparql run 3 graded by code · query session

E10, the guarantor of I05. It is rated BBB+ (A27).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D4 sparql run 4 graded by code · query session

E10 (Halden Bank AG), rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10, whose rating was cut to BBB+ on 2026-04-15 (A27).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D4 sparql run 5 graded by code · query session

A holder takes the credit risk of E10, the guarantor of I05. E10 is rated BBB+ (A27).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 1 graded by code · query session

E10 (Halden Bank), rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10 and was downgraded to BBB+ on 2026-04-15.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 2 graded by code · query session

The holder takes E10's credit risk, rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10, whose rating fell to BBB+ on 2026-04-15.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 3 graded by code · query session

Halden Bank (E10), rated BBB+. The notes (I05) are guaranteed by E10, and their own rating is BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 4 graded by code · query session

E10 (Halden Bank), rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10, and its rating is BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 5 graded by code · query session

The holder takes the risk of E10, the guarantor of I05. I05 is rated BBB+ (downgraded 2026-04-15).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 1 graded by code · query session

E10 (Halden Bank), rated BBB+ (A27). I05 is guaranteed by E10.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 2 graded by code · query session

The holder takes E10's credit risk (Halden Bank, the guarantor of I05), which is rated BBB+ (A27).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 3 graded by code · query session

The holder takes E10's credit risk (guarantor of I05). It is rated BBB+ (I05 A29, E10 A27).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 4 graded by code · query session

The holder takes the risk of E10, Halden Bank, the guarantor of I05. E10 is rated BBB+ (A27), as is I05 (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 5 graded by code · query session

The holder takes E10's credit risk, as guarantor of I05. I05 is rated BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 1 graded by code · query session

E10, rated BBB+ (A27). E10 guarantees I05.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 2 graded by code · query session

E10, rated BBB+. The 2028 notes (I05) are guaranteed by E10, and I05 is rated BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 3 graded by code · query session

The notes (I05) carry the credit risk of E10, the guarantor. They are rated BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 4 graded by code · query session

E10, rated BBB+ (A27). I05 is guaranteed by E10.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 5 graded by code · query session

E10, the guarantor, rated BBB+ (A29 on I05).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}