Q4, run 2026-11-06-0041-sonnet-query
What is Northwind Holdings' current outlook?
Tests: Identity: two records with the same LEI are one entity, whatever their names.
Expected: outlook = positive
sql run 1
Positive. E03 is a RESEARCH duplicate of E02 (same LEI). Its latest action, A09 (2025-09-15), is an affirmation with a POS outlook, later than E02's STA in A08.
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sql run 2
Positive. E03 is a RESEARCH duplicate of E02 (same LEI), and its latest action A09 (2025-09-15) is A with a Positive outlook. E02's own record still shows Stable (A08). I treated the later one as current, but the two records conflict.
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sql run 3
Positive. E02 and E03 share one LEI, so they are the same entity, and the latest action is A09 (2025-09-15), an affirmation at A with a Positive outlook.
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sql run 4
POS. E03 is a duplicate record of E02 (same LEI), and its latest action is A09 on 2025-09-15, an affirmation at A with a Positive outlook. E02's own last outlook (A08) was Stable.
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sql run 5
Positive. E03 is the research duplicate of E02 (same LEI), and its latest action is A09 (2025-09-15), A with a Positive outlook.
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sql+markdown run 1
POS. E03 has the same LEI as E02, so it is the same entity. A09 (2025-09-15, E03) is the latest action and sets the outlook to POS.
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sql+markdown run 2
Positive. E03 is the same entity as E02 (same LEI), and A09 affirmed A with a POS outlook on 2025-09-15.
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sql+markdown run 3
Positive. E02 and E03 share one LEI, so they are one entity. The latest action is A09 on E03 (2025-09-15), which carries a POS outlook.
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sql+markdown run 4
Positive. E02 and E03 share an LEI, so they are the same entity, and the latest action is A09 (2025-09-15) with outlook POS.
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sql+markdown run 5
Positive (POS). E02 and E03 share an LEI, so they are one entity, and the latest action is A09 on E03 (2025-09-15, POS).
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sparql run 1
Positive. E02 and E03 share one LEI, so they are the same entity. The latest action is A09 (E03, 2025-09-15), with a Positive outlook; E02's A08 was Stable.
JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}
sparql run 2
Positive. E02 and E03 share one LEI, so they are the same entity, and the latest action is A09 (2025-09-15, A / Positive).
JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}
sparql run 3
Positive. E02 and E03 share one LEI, so they are the same entity. The latest action is A09 (2025-09-15), with a Positive outlook.
JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}
sparql run 4
Positive. E02 and E03 share one LEI, so they are the same entity, and the latest action is A09 (2025-09-15) with a Positive outlook.
JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}
sparql run 5
Positive. E03 is the same entity as E02 (same LEI), and its latest action is an affirmation at A with a Positive outlook (A09, 2025-09-15). I did not run a query to re-check this against E02's own records.
JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}
sparql+ontology run 1
Positive. E02 and E03 share one LEI, so they are one entity. The latest action is A09 (E03, 2025-09-15), which affirmed A with a Positive outlook.
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sparql+ontology run 2
Positive. E02 and E03 share an LEI, so they are one entity. The latest action is A09 on E03 (2025-09-15), which affirmed A with a POS outlook.
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sparql+ontology run 3
Positive. E02 and E03 share an LEI and are one entity; its latest action is A09 (E03, 2025-09-15), which affirmed A with a Positive outlook.
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sparql+ontology run 4
Positive. E03 is the RESEARCH record of the same LEI as E02, so they are one entity. Its latest action is A09 (2025-09-15, A, POS).
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sparql+ontology run 5
Positive. E03 (NORTHWIND HLDGS) shares a LEI with E02, so they are one entity. Its latest action, A09 on 2025-09-15, is an affirmation at A with a Positive outlook.
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sql+executed run 1
Positive. E02's current rating is A with a POS outlook (A09).
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sql+executed run 2
Positive. E02 (which merges E03) has had an A rating with a Positive outlook since 2025-09-15 (A09).
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sql+executed run 3
Positive. E02, merged with E03, has been A/POS since 2025-09-15 (A09).
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sql+executed run 4
Positive, from E02's rating A09 (the E02/E03 merged entity).
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sql+executed run 5
Positive. E02 has been rated A with a POS outlook since 2025-09-15 (A09).
JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}
sparql+axioms run 1
Positive. E02 and E03 are the same entity (same LEI). E02's rating ended in 2025, and E03's A09 (A, Positive) is current.
JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}
sparql+axioms run 2
Positive. A09 on E03 (the same entity as E02) is A with a Positive outlook.
JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}
sparql+axioms run 3
Positive. A09, on E03, which is the same entity as E02, is the current action.
JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}
sparql+axioms run 4
Positive. E02 and E03 are the same entity (same LEI). A09 (Positive outlook, A) took over from A08 on 2025-09-15.
JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}
sparql+axioms run 5
Positive. A09 sits on E03, which is the same entity as E02, and it is the rating in force.
JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}