Q34, run 2026-11-06-0041-sonnet-query
Is Halden Foods part of the same group as Halden Bank?
Tests: Groups: a shared name is not a shared group.
Expected: same_group = no
sql run 1
No. E12 has no parent and no link to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql run 2
No. E12 has no parent link, so the data does not tie it to the Halden group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql run 3
No. E12 (Halden Foods) has no parent link, so it is not in E09's group; the shared name is not evidence.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql run 4
No. E12 has no parent and no link to E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql run 5
No. Halden Foods (E12) has no parent link to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+markdown run 1
Yes. E12 (Halden Foods) has no parent and is not part of the E09 group. The question is ambiguous on which Halden Foods is meant, so this assumes Halden Bank (E10) is the intended Halden entity and the answer is "no" for Foods. Correction: E12 has no parent link to E09, so they are not in the same group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+markdown run 2
No. E12 has no parent and is not linked to the Halden group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+markdown run 3
Yes. E10 has E09 as its parent, and E12 (Halden Foods) is not in that chain.
JSON: {"same_group": "yes"}
Why: same_group: expected no, got yes
sql+markdown run 4
Yes in the sense that matters for the question only if Halden Foods has a parent link. E12 has none, so it is not in E09's group. The answer is no.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+markdown run 5
No. Halden Foods (E12) has no parent and no link to E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql run 1
No. E12 has no parent link to E09, so the data doesn't place it in the group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql run 2
No. Halden Foods (E12) has no parent link and a different LEI to the Halden group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql run 3
No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql run 4
No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql run 5
No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+ontology run 1
No. E12 has no parent and is not in E09's group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+ontology run 2
No. E12 has no parent link, so it is outside the E09 group that contains E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+ontology run 3
No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+ontology run 4
No. E12 has no parent link and is not in E09's chain.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+ontology run 5
No. E12 (Halden Foods) has no parent link to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+executed run 1
Yes. E12 (Halden Foods) has no parent and appears in no ancestors rows, so it does not sit in E09's chain, where E10 sits. I answered "no" below, so I am correcting that: the data does not link them, so the answer is **no**.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+executed run 2
No. E12 has no parent and is not linked to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+executed run 3
No. E12 has no parent and is not in E09's group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+executed run 4
No. Halden Foods (E12) has no parent, so it is not in E09's group, while Halden Bank (E10) is.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+executed run 5
No. E12 (Halden Foods) has no parent, while E10 sits under E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+axioms run 1
No. E12 has no parent and is its own ultimate parent, whereas E10 rolls up to E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+axioms run 2
No. Halden Foods (E12) is its own ultimate parent, while Halden Bank's ultimate parent is E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+axioms run 3
No. E12 has no parent and no link to E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+axioms run 4
No. E12 is its own ultimate parent, separate from E09's group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+axioms run 5
No. E12 (Halden Foods) is its own ultimate parent.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}