Q34, run 2026-11-06-0935-sonnet-query
Is Halden Foods part of the same group as Halden Bank?
Tests: Groups: a shared name is not a shared group.
Expected: same_group = no
sql run 1
No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10, and the shared "Halden" name is not evidence of a group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql run 2
No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10; the shared name is the only connection.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql run 3
No. E12 has no parent link to E09, and the shared name isn't evidence of a group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql run 4
No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10, and the similar name is not evidence of a group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql run 5
No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10, and the shared "Halden" name is not evidence of a group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+markdown run 1
No. E12 has no parent and is not in E09's chain.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+markdown run 2
No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+markdown run 3
Yes. Halden Foods (E12) has no parent and no link to the Halden group in the data, so E12 is not in the same group as E10. This is "no", not "yes". The JSON below uses "no".
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+markdown run 4
No. E12 has no parent link and is not in E09's group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+markdown run 5
No. E12 has no parent and is not in E09's group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql run 1
No. E12 has no parent link to E09, so the data does not put it in the group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql run 2
No. The data has no parent link for E12, so it is not linked to E09 or E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql run 3
No. E12 has no parent link to the Halden group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql run 4
No. E12 has no parent link to the E09 group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql run 5
No. E12 has no parent link to the Halden group, and the shared name is not evidence of a relationship.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+ontology run 1
No. E12 has no parent link, so it is not in E09's group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+ontology run 2
No. E12 has no parent link and is not in E09's chain.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+ontology run 3
No. E12 has no parent link, so it is not in E09's group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+ontology run 4
No. E12 has no parent and sits outside the E09 group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+ontology run 5
No. E12 has no parent link and no shared ultimate parent with E10.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+executed run 1
No. E12 has no parent, and E10 sits under E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+executed run 2
No. E12 has no parent and isn't in E09's group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+executed run 3
No. E12 has no parent, and E10's ultimate parent is E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+executed run 4
No. E12 has no parent and is not in E09's chain, which covers E10 and E11.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sql+executed run 5
No. E12 has no parent, while E10's ultimate parent is E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+axioms run 1
No. Halden Foods (E12) has no ownership link to the Halden group; it is its own ultimate parent.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+axioms run 2
No. Halden Foods E12 is its own ultimate parent, while Halden Bank is in the E09 group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+axioms run 3
No. E12 has no parent link to E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+axioms run 4
No. E12 is its own ultimate parent, while E10 sits under E09.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}
sparql+axioms run 5
No. E12 is its own ultimate parent, separate from the E09 group.
JSON: {"same_group": "no"}