D1 sql, run 3: the query session
3 queries0 failed1 rounds
The opening prompt
## The data
You can't see the data, but you can query it. It is in DuckDB, in the tables below. Write DuckDB SQL.
To run queries, reply with one or more fenced blocks (```sql), and nothing else is needed:
each is run and its results sent back to you. You have up to 8 rounds of queries.
When you have what you need, reply with the final answers and no queries.
All columns are text (VARCHAR); dates are ISO strings.
- `entities` (19 rows): entity_id, name, lei, country, entity_type, parent_id, source_system
- `instruments` (8 rows): instrument_id, description, issuer_id, guarantor_id, seniority, currency, maturity
- `rating_actions` (47 rows): action_id, date, rated_id, rating_type, ccy_basis, action, rating, outlook, watch, comment
## Questions
Answer each question below from the data above. Start each answer on a new line with its
number in bold, like **Q1.**, give the direct answer first, then at most two sentences of
reasoning that cite the records (IDs) you relied on.
Then end with one JSON block (```json) holding the structured answer to each question listed
here, with exactly these fields, shaped like {"Q1": {"field": value}, ...}. Name entities by their record ID: the entity_id in the CSV files, or the part of the IRI after lad: in the RDF (E01, not Kestrel Energy plc).
- Q1: rating (a rating, or "none")
- Q2: downgraded ("yes", "no" or "depends")
- Q3: investment_grade ("yes", "no" or "depends"), rating (a rating, or "none")
- Q4: outlook (an outlook)
- Q5: risk_of (a record ID), rating (a rating, or "none")
- Q7: issuers (a list of record IDs)
- Q8: entities (a list of record IDs)
- Q9: count (a number)
- Q10: investment_grade ("yes", "no" or "depends")
- Q11: rating (a rating, or "none")
- Q12: rating (a rating, or "none")
- Q13: count (a number)
- Q14: rating (a rating, or "none")
- Q15: rating (a rating, or "none")
- Q16: changed ("yes", "no" or "depends")
- Q17: downgraded ("yes", "no" or "depends")
- Q18: issuers (a list of record IDs)
- Q19: issuers (a list of record IDs)
- Q20: in_default ("yes", "no" or "depends")
- Q21: entities (a list of record IDs)
- Q22: entities (a list of record IDs)
- Q23: rating (a rating, or "none")
- Q24: investment_grade ("yes", "no" or "depends")
- Q25: count (a number)
- Q26: rating (a rating, or "none")
- Q27: rating (a rating, or "none")
- Q28: rating (a rating, or "none")
- Q29: rating (a rating, or "none")
- Q30: entities (a list of record IDs)
- Q31: any ("yes", "no" or "depends")
- Q32: parent (a record ID)
- Q33: risk_of (a record ID), rating (a rating, or "none")
- Q34: same_group ("yes", "no" or "depends")
- Q35: count (a number)
- Q36: count (a number)
- Q37: count (a number)
- Q38: same ("yes", "no" or "depends")
- Q39: rating (a rating, or "none")
- Q40: count (a number)
- Q41: rating (a rating, or "none")
- Q42: country (a country code)
- Q43: count (a number)
- Q44: local_currency ("yes", "no" or "depends")
- Q45: above_ceiling ("yes", "no" or "depends")
- Q46: issuer_rating ("yes", "no" or "depends")
- Q47: rating (a rating, or "none")
- Q48: count (a number)
Q1. What was Kestrel Energy's rating on 1 January 2025?
Q2. Has Kestrel Energy been downgraded in 2026?
Q3. Is Kestrel Energy's 2031 note investment grade?
Q4. What is Northwind Holdings' current outlook?
Q5. Whose credit risk does a holder of the Northwind Finance 2030 notes take, and how is it rated?
Q6. Why is Valdoria Telecom's foreign-currency rating lower than its local-currency rating?
Q7. Which issuers were downgraded in 2026?
Q8. Which entities were in default on 1 October 2026?
Q9. As of 1 October 2026, how many distinct issuers hold an issuer rating?
Q10. Is Valdoria Telecom investment grade?
Q11. What was Marlow Utilities' rating on 1 June 2025?
Q12. What was Marlow Utilities' rating on 1 January 2024?
Q13. How many times has Marlow Utilities been downgraded?
Q14. What was Halden Foods' rating on 1 January 2024?
Q15. What was Halden Bank's rating on 1 January 2026?
Q16. Has Marlow Utilities' rating changed since 1 January 2025?
Q17. Was Orrin Bank downgraded in 2026?
Q18. Which issuers were on Rating Watch Negative on 1 October 2026?
Q19. Which issuers had a Negative outlook on 1 October 2026?
Q20. Is Pellam Retail in default?
Q21. Which entities had an issuer rating at some point but no longer had one on 1 October 2026?
Q22. Which entities have ever been in default?
Q23. What is Kestrel Energy's short-term rating?
Q24. Is Kestrel Energy's issuer rating investment grade?
Q25. How many instruments held an investment-grade rating on 1 October 2026?
Q26. What is Corvenia Power's local-currency rating?
Q27. How is Corvenia Power's 2032 note rated?
Q28. What is the Republic of Corvenia's foreign-currency issuer rating?
Q29. What is the Republic of Valdoria's issuer rating?
Q30. Which entities had a foreign-currency issuer rating exactly at their country's ceiling on 1 October 2026?
Q31. Did any company have a foreign-currency issuer rating above its country's ceiling on 1 October 2026?
Q32. Who is Halden Leasing's ultimate parent?
Q33. Whose credit risk does a holder of the Halden Leasing 2028 notes take, and how is it rated?
Q34. Is Halden Foods part of the same group as Halden Bank?
Q35. How many entities are in the Halden group, the parent included?
Q36. How many entities are in the Northwind group, the parent included?
Q37. How many distinct legal entities does the data describe?
Q38. Are Orrin Bank AG and Orrin Bancorp Inc the same entity?
Q39. What is Northwind Holdings' current rating?
Q40. How many distinct issuers domiciled in GB held an issuer rating on 1 October 2026?
Q41. What is Brindle Capital's current rating?
Q42. In which country is Halden Bank domiciled?
Q43. How many distinct entities are domiciled in Luxembourg (LU)?
Q44. Is Valdoria Telecom's 2027 note a local-currency obligation?
Q45. Is Valdoria Telecom's 2027 note rated above what Valdoria's Country Ceiling allows?
Q46. Does Halden Leasing have an issuer rating?
Q47. How is Corvenia Power's 2034 note rated?
Q48. How many instruments held a rating on 1 October 2026?The model
Let me start by looking at the data.
```sql
SELECT * FROM entities ORDER BY entity_id;
```
```sql
SELECT * FROM instruments ORDER BY instrument_id;
```
```sql
SELECT * FROM rating_actions ORDER BY rated_id, date, action_id;
```Query results
Query 1:
| entity_id | name | lei | country | entity_type | parent_id | source_system |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Republic of Corvenia | | CV | SOV | | RATINGS |
| E01 | Kestrel Energy plc | 7245002OOPBG04092E43 | GB | CORP | | RATINGS |
| E02 | Northwind Holdings plc | 213800PHEIYNJMHTDV74 | GB | CORP | | RATINGS |
| E03 | NORTHWIND HLDGS | 213800PHEIYNJMHTDV74 | GB | CORP | | RESEARCH |
| E04 | Northwind Finance BV | 213800LA5RYJLGXV2T85 | NL | FINSUB | E02 | RATINGS |
| E05 | Valdoria Telecom SA | 391200LESH03LMOY2U61 | VD | CORP | | RATINGS |
| E06 | Orrin Bank AG | 549300AMVE3VRVG7HK43 | DE | BANK | | RATINGS |
| E07 | Pellam Retail Ltd | 969500B6IUACELPI2291 | GB | CORP | | RATINGS |
| E08 | Saxby Shipping SA | 969500KOTZ1JFIZSG796 | GR | CORP | | RATINGS |
| E09 | Halden Group plc | 815600ASM9EHDG931T89 | GB | CORP | | RATINGS |
| E10 | Halden Bank AG | 391200QYPVFF2O9K2039 | DE | BANK | E09 | RATINGS |
| E11 | Halden Leasing SA | 549300XBZH4ULO9MQV55 | FR | FINSUB | E10 | RATINGS |
| E12 | Halden Foods Ltd | 213800IJDL4OJ4DG5T19 | GB | CORP | | RATINGS |
| E13 | Orrin Bancorp Inc | 815600O8X8K2F154N214 | US | BANK | | RATINGS |
| E14 | Marlow Utilities plc | 3912005AH2C1I9YF8106 | GB | CORP | | RATINGS |
| E15 | Corvenia Power SA | 213800PBQVHVBBH6GV02 | CV | CORP | | RATINGS |
| E16 | Brindle Capital Ltd | 5493003Z3PXXR7KNFM81 | GB | CORP | | QA |
| E17 | HALDEN BANK | 391200QYPVFF2O9K2039 | LU | BANK | | RESEARCH |
| VD | Republic of Valdoria | | VD | SOV | | RATINGS |
Query 2:
| instrument_id | description | issuer_id | guarantor_id | seniority | currency | maturity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I01 | Kestrel Energy 4.50% notes due 2030 | E01 | | SU | GBP | 2030-03-15 |
| I02 | Kestrel Energy 6.25% notes due 2031 | E01 | | SUB | GBP | 2031-09-30 |
| I03 | Northwind Finance 3.75% notes due 2030 | E04 | E02 | SU | EUR | 2030-05-01 |
| I04 | Valdoria Telecom 5.00% notes due 2029 | E05 | | SU | USD | 2029-11-20 |
| I05 | Halden Leasing 2.90% notes due 2028 | E11 | E10 | SU | EUR | 2028-06-30 |
| I06 | Corvenia Power 7.10% notes due 2032 | E15 | | SUB | USD | 2032-02-15 |
| I07 | Valdoria Telecom 4.25% notes due 2027 | E05 | | SU | XVD | 2027-08-31 |
| I08 | Corvenia Power 6.00% notes due 2034 | E15 | | SU | USD | 2034-09-01 |
Query 3:
| action_id | date | rated_id | rating_type | ccy_basis | action | rating | outlook | watch | comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A37 | 2024-01-01 | CV | CC | | AS | A | | | |
| A38 | 2024-01-01 | CV | LTIDR | FC | AS | BBB+ | STA | | |
| A39 | 2024-01-01 | CV | LTIDR | LC | AS | A- | STA | | |
| A01 | 2024-03-12 | E01 | LTIDR | FC | AS | A- | STA | | |
| A02 | 2025-06-20 | E01 | LTIDR | FC | DG | BBB | STA | | weaker cash flow after asset sale |
| A03 | 2026-02-10 | E01 | LTIDR | FC | AF | BBB | NEG | | |
| A04 | 2026-02-10 | E01 | STIDR | FC | AF | F2 | | | |
| A08 | 2023-11-01 | E02 | LTIDR | FC | AS | A | STA | | |
| A09 | 2025-09-15 | E03 | LTIDR | FC | AF | A | POS | | |
| A13 | 2025-04-01 | E05 | LTIDR | LC | AS | BBB- | STA | | |
| A14 | 2025-04-01 | E05 | LTIDR | FC | AS | BB | STA | | |
| A16 | 2024-05-01 | E06 | LTIDR | FC | AS | A- | STA | | |
| A17 | 2026-09-03 | E06 | LTIDR | FC | RW | A- | | RWN | |
| A18 | 2024-01-10 | E07 | LTIDR | FC | AS | BB | STA | | |
| A19 | 2026-05-12 | E07 | LTIDR | FC | WD | WD | | | commercial reasons |
| A20 | 2024-06-01 | E08 | LTIDR | FC | AS | B | STA | | |
| A21 | 2026-01-20 | E08 | LTIDR | FC | DG | CCC | | | |
| A22 | 2026-07-08 | E08 | LTIDR | FC | DG | RD | | | distressed debt exchange completed |
| A24 | 2023-05-01 | E09 | LTIDR | FC | AS | A | STA | | |
| A25 | 2026-03-01 | E09 | LTIDR | FC | AF | A | NEG | | |
| A26 | 2023-05-01 | E10 | LTIDR | FC | AS | A- | STA | | support from parent |
| A27 | 2026-04-15 | E10 | LTIDR | FC | DG | BBB+ | STA | | |
| A46 | 2025-02-01 | E11 | CO | | AS | BBB | | | |
| A30 | 2024-02-01 | E12 | LTIDR | FC | AS | BB- | STA | | |
| A31 | 2025-08-01 | E12 | LTIDR | FC | UG | BB | STA | | |
| A32 | 2024-07-01 | E13 | LTIDR | FC | AS | BBB | STA | | |
| A34 | 2023-01-15 | E14 | LTIDR | FC | AS | A- | STA | | |
| A36 | 2024-09-30 | E14 | LTIDR | FC | DG | BBB+ | STA | | |
| A35 | 2025-11-20 | E14 | LTIDR | FC | RW | BBB+ | | RWN | |
| A33 | 2026-05-01 | E14 | LTIDR | FC | AF | BBB+ | STA | | |
| A40 | 2024-03-01 | E15 | LTIDR | LC | AS | A+ | STA | | |
| A41 | 2024-03-01 | E15 | LTIDR | FC | AS | A | STA | | |
| A43 | 2024-04-01 | E16 | LTIDR | FC | AS | BBB- | STA | | |
| A44 | 2026-06-01 | E16 | LTIDR | FC | DG | BB+ | STA | | |
| A05 | 2024-03-12 | I01 | INST | | AS | A- | | | |
| A06 | 2025-06-20 | I01 | INST | | DG | BBB | | | |
| A23 | 2024-03-12 | I02 | INST | | AS | BBB | | | |
| A07 | 2025-06-20 | I02 | INST | | DG | BB+ | | | |
| A10 | 2023-11-01 | I03 | INST | | AS | A | | | |
| A11 | 2025-09-15 | I03 | INST | | AF | A | | | |
| A15 | 2025-04-01 | I04 | INST | | AS | BB | | | |
| A28 | 2023-06-01 | I05 | INST | | AS | A- | | | |
| A29 | 2026-04-15 | I05 | INST | | DG | BBB+ | | | |
| A42 | 2024-03-01 | I06 | INST | | AS | A- | | | |
| A45 | 2025-04-01 | I07 | INST | | AS | BBB- | | | |
| A47 | 2026-09-01 | I08 | INST | | EX | A | | | |
| A12 | 2025-04-01 | VD | CC | | AS | BB | | | |
Run more queries, or give the final answers.The model
**Q1.** A-. Kestrel's LTIDR was A- from A01 (2024-03-12), and the downgrade to BBB (A02) came only on 2025-06-20.
**Q2.** No. The only 2026 actions on E01 are A03 and A04, which are affirmations. A03 moved the outlook to Negative, but the rating stayed BBB.
**Q3.** No. I02, the 2031 note, was cut to BB+ by A07, which is sub-investment grade.
**Q4.** Positive. E03 is a duplicate record of E02 (same LEI). Its latest action, A09 (2025-09-15), has a POS outlook and is newer than A08's STA.
**Q5.** A holder takes the risk of the guarantor, E02, which is rated A (A08, A09). The issuer E04 is a finance subsidiary, and I03 itself is also rated A.
**Q6.** This isn't a question with a JSON field. The Valdoria Country Ceiling (A12) is BB, and it caps the foreign-currency rating (A14, BB). The local-currency rating (A13) is BBB-.
**Q7.** E08, E10 and E16 were downgraded in 2026 (A21 and A22, A27, A44). E11's I05 downgrade is an instrument rating, not an issuer downgrade.
**Q8.** E08. It was rated RD from A22 on 2026-07-08. E07's rating was withdrawn (A19), which is not a default.
**Q9.** 13. These are CV, E01, E02/E03 (one entity), E05, E06, E08, E09, E10, E12, E13, E14, E15 and E16. E07 was withdrawn, and E11 has only a "CO" rating.
**Q10.** Depends. Valdoria Telecom's local-currency rating is BBB- (investment grade, A13). Its foreign-currency rating is BB (not investment grade, A14).
**Q11.** BBB+. A36 downgraded E14 from A- on 2024-09-30.
**Q12.** A-, from A34.
**Q13.** 1. Only A36 is a downgrade for E14.
**Q14.** None. E12's first rating, A30, came on 2024-02-01.
**Q15.** A-. This is E10's rating (A26). E17 is a duplicate record, and the downgrade A27 came later, in April 2026.
**Q16.** No. It was BBB+ on 2025-01-01 and is BBB+ now. The 2025 watch (A35) was resolved by the affirmation A33.
**Q17.** No. A17 is a Rating Watch Negative placement with the rating unchanged at A-.
**Q18.** E06, from A17.
**Q19.** E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
**Q20.** No. The data shows only a withdrawal (A19) for E07, not a default.
**Q21.** E07, whose rating was withdrawn by A19.
**Q22.** E08 (A22, RD).
**Q23.** F2, from A04.
**Q24.** Yes. The issuer rating is BBB (A03).
**Q25.** 5. Of the instruments, I01, I03, I05, I06 and I07 were investment grade on that date. I02 and I04 were not. I08's A47 has action code "EX", which the data doesn't define, so I haven't counted it. If it is a final rating, the count would be 6.
**Q26.** A+, from A40.
**Q27.** A-, from A42.
**Q28.** BBB+, from A38.
**Q29.** None. VD has only a Country Ceiling record (A12), no issuer rating.
**Q30.** E05 and E15. E05's foreign-currency rating is BB against the BB ceiling. E15's is A against the A ceiling.
**Q31.** No. No company's foreign-currency rating is above its ceiling.
**Q32.** E09. E11's parent is E10, whose parent is E09.
**Q33.** The guarantor E10 is the risk, and it is rated BBB+ (A27). I05 itself is also rated BBB+.
**Q34.** No. E12 has no parent link to E09, and the shared name isn't evidence of a group.
**Q35.** 3: E09, E10 and E11. E17 duplicates E10 by LEI.
**Q36.** 2: E02 and E04. E03 duplicates E02 by LEI.
**Q37.** 17. E03 duplicates E02 and E17 duplicates E10, both by LEI.
**Q38.** No. They have different LEIs, countries and parent records.
**Q39.** A, from A08 and A09.
**Q40.** 6: E01, E02/E03 (one entity), E09, E12, E14 and E16.
**Q41.** BB+, from A44.
**Q42.** DE (E10). The LU record E17 is a RESEARCH duplicate of E10.
**Q43.** 0. The only LU record is E17, which duplicates the DE entity E10.
**Q44.** Yes. I07 is in XVD, which appears to be Valdoria's local currency. The data doesn't define this explicitly.
**Q45.** No. I07 is rated BBB- (A45). The Country Ceiling of BB caps foreign-currency ratings, and I07 is local-currency.
**Q46.** No. E11 has only a "CO" rating (A46), not an issuer rating (LTIDR).
**Q47.** None. The only action on I08 is A47, with the undefined code "EX" and rating A. I've treated it as not a settled rating, but it could be one.
**Q48.** 7. I01 to I07 each have a standing rating, and I08 is excluded for the reason given in Q47.
```json
{
"Q1": {"rating": "A-"},
"Q2": {"downgraded": "no"},
"Q3": {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"},
"Q4": {"outlook": "POS"},
"Q5": {"risk_of": "E02", "rating": "A"},
"Q7": {"issuers": ["E08","E10","E16"]},
"Q8": {"entities": ["E08"]},
"Q9": {"count": 13},
"Q10": {"investment_grade": "depends"},
"Q11": {"rating": "BBB+"},
"Q12": {"rating": "A-"},
"Q13": {"count": 1},
"Q14": {"rating": "none"},
"Q15": {"rating": "A-"},
"Q16": {"changed": "no"},
"Q17": {"downgraded": "no"},
"Q18": {"issuers": ["E06"]},
"Q19": {"issuers": ["E01","E09"]},
"Q20": {"in_default": "no"},
"Q21": {"entities": ["E07"]},
"Q22": {"entities": ["E08"]},
"Q23": {"rating": "F2"},
"Q24": {"investment_grade": "yes"},
"Q25": {"count": 5},
"Q26": {"rating": "A+"},
"Q27": {"rating": "A-"},
"Q28": {"rating": "BBB+"},
"Q29": {"rating": "none"},
"Q30": {"entities": ["E05","E15"]},
"Q31": {"any": "no"},
"Q32": {"parent": "E09"},
"Q33": {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"},
"Q34": {"same_group": "no"},
"Q35": {"count": 3},
"Q36": {"count": 2},
"Q37": {"count": 17},
"Q38": {"same": "no"},
"Q39": {"rating": "A"},
"Q40": {"count": 6},
"Q41": {"rating": "BB+"},
"Q42": {"country": "DE"},
"Q43": {"count": 0},
"Q44": {"local_currency": "yes"},
"Q45": {"above_ceiling": "no"},
"Q46": {"issuer_rating": "no"},
"Q47": {"rating": "none"},
"Q48": {"count": 7}
}
```