Q33, run 2026-11-06-0935-sonnet-query

← back to the run

Whose credit risk does a holder of the Halden Leasing 2028 notes take, and how is it rated?

Tests: Roles: the guarantor is the parent, not the ultimate parent.

Expected: risk_of = E10 rating = BBB+

✅ D1 sql run 1 graded by code · query session

The holder takes the risk of E10, the guarantor of I05, which is rated BBB+ (A27).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D1 sql run 2 graded by code · query session

The guarantor, E10 (Halden Bank). I05 is guaranteed by E10 and is rated BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D1 sql run 3 graded by code · query session

The guarantor E10 is the risk, and it is rated BBB+ (A27). I05 itself is also rated BBB+.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D1 sql run 4 graded by code · query session

The risk is that of E10, rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10, and the rating is BBB+ after A27/A29.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D1 sql run 5 graded by code · query session

The holder takes the risk of E10, the guarantor, and the note is rated BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 1 graded by code · query session

The holder takes Halden Bank's credit risk (E10), rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10, and A27 set E10 at BBB+.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 2 graded by code · query session

The holder takes E10's (Halden Bank's) credit risk, rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10, whose latest rating is BBB+ (A27).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 3 graded by code · query session

A holder takes the credit risk of E10 (Halden Bank), rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10, whose current rating is BBB+ after A27.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 4 graded by code · query session

A holder takes the credit risk of E10 (Halden Bank), the guarantor of I05. Its current rating is BBB+ (A27).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 5 graded by code · query session

The holder takes E10's credit risk, rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10, whose current LTIDR FC is BBB+ (A27).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D4 sparql run 1 graded by code · query session

E10, the guarantor of I05 (which E11 issued). I05 is rated BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D4 sparql run 2 graded by code · query session

The holder takes the risk of E10 (Halden Bank), the guarantor of I05, which is rated BBB+ (A27).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D4 sparql run 3 graded by code · query session

The holder takes the credit risk of E10, the guarantor of I05. E10 is rated BBB+ (A27) and the note is BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D4 sparql run 4 graded by code · query session

The risk is E10, the guarantor of I05, which is rated BBB+ (A27).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D4 sparql run 5 graded by code · query session

The risk is E10 (the guarantor), rated BBB+. I05 is issued by E11 but guaranteed by E10, and was downgraded to BBB+ on 2026-04-15 (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 1 graded by code · query session

The guarantor E10 (Halden Bank), rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10, whose latest rating is BBB+ (A27). The BBB CO on E11 is not a rating.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 2 graded by code · query session

The credit risk of Halden Bank (E10), rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10 and rated BBB+.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 3 graded by code · query session

The holder takes the credit risk of E10, Halden Bank. I05 is guaranteed by E10, which is rated BBB+ after A27.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 4 graded by code · query session

The holder takes the credit risk of E10 (Halden Bank), rated BBB+. I05 is guaranteed by E10, and A27 is its latest action.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 5 graded by code · query session

The holder takes the credit risk of E10, the guarantor. I05 is rated BBB+ (A29), the same as E10's issuer rating.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 1 graded by code · query session

E10, the guarantor, and the note (I05) is rated BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 2 graded by code · query session

E10 (Halden Bank), the guarantor of I05. The note is rated BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 3 graded by code · query session

E10, the guarantor of I05. I05 is rated BBB+ (A29), the same as E10's issuer rating.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 4 graded by code · query session

The Halden Leasing 2028 notes (I05) carry the credit risk of the guarantor E10, and the note is rated BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 5 graded by code · query session

E10, the guarantor of I05. I05 is rated BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 1 graded by code · query session

E10, rated BBB+. The Halden Leasing 2028 note (I05) is guaranteed by E10 and rated BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 2 graded by code · query session

The holder takes the credit risk of E10, Halden Bank, which guarantees I05. It is rated BBB+ (A27, A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 3 graded by code · query session

E10 (Halden Bank, the guarantor), rated BBB+ (A27).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 4 graded by code · query session

E10, as guarantor of I05, and the note is rated BBB+ (A29).

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}

✅ D6 sparql+axioms run 5 graded by code · query session

E10, rated BBB+ (A27). I05 is guaranteed by E10.

JSON: {"risk_of": "E10", "rating": "BBB+"}