Q17, run 2026-11-06-0935-sonnet-query
Was Orrin Bank downgraded in 2026?
Tests: Watch versus rating: Rating Watch Negative is not a downgrade.
Expected: downgraded = no
sql run 1
No. A17 only placed Orrin Bank on Rating Watch Negative, and its rating stayed at A-.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sql run 2
No. Orrin Bank has only a Rating Watch Negative action (A17), with the rating still A-.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sql run 3
No. A17 is a Rating Watch Negative placement with the rating unchanged at A-.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sql run 4
No. A17 only placed E06's A- rating on Rating Watch Negative.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sql run 5
No. A17 (2026-09-03) only placed it on Rating Watch Negative at A-.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sql+markdown run 1
No. E06's only 2026 action is the Rating Watch A17, which does not change the rating.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sql+markdown run 2
No. A17 is only a Rating Watch (RW), which is not a downgrade.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sql+markdown run 3
No. A17 is only a Rating Watch.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sql+markdown run 4
No. Orrin Bank's only 2026 action is a Rating Watch (A17), which is not a downgrade.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sql+markdown run 5
No. E06's only 2026 action is the Rating Watch A17, which is not a downgrade.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sparql run 1
No. Orrin Bank's only 2026 action is a Rating Watch Negative (A17) at A-, which is not a downgrade.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sparql run 2
No. A17 (2026-09-03) only placed Orrin Bank AG (E06) on Rating Watch Negative and left the A- rating unchanged.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sparql run 3
No. A17 placed E06 on Rating Watch Negative but kept A-.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sparql run 4
No. A17 is only a Rating Watch Negative and the rating stays A-.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sparql run 5
No. E06 only had a Rating Watch Negative placed on 2026-09-03 (A17), with the rating kept at A-.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sparql+ontology run 1
No. E06 only has A17, a Rating Watch placement, which is not a downgrade.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sparql+ontology run 2
No. A17 is only a Rating Watch.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sparql+ontology run 3
No. E06's only 2026 action is a Rating Watch (A17), which is not a downgrade.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sparql+ontology run 4
No. A17 is only a Rating Watch Negative, not a downgrade.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sparql+ontology run 5
No. Orrin Bank's only 2026 action is A17, a Rating Watch with the rating unchanged at A-.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sql+executed run 1
No. E06 was placed on Rating Watch Negative (A17) with the rating still A-.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sql+executed run 2
No. E06 stayed at A- and was placed on Rating Watch Negative on 2026-09-03 (A17), which is not a downgrade.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sql+executed run 3
No. The 2026-09-03 action (A17) put E06 on Rating Watch Negative and the rating stayed at A-.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sql+executed run 4
No. E06 was placed on Rating Watch Negative at an unchanged A- (A17).
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sql+executed run 5
No. E06 stayed at A- and was placed on Rating Watch Negative (A17), which is not a downgrade.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sparql+axioms run 1
No. Orrin Bank's A- was kept and placed on Rating Watch Negative (A17).
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sparql+axioms run 2
No. A17 only placed Orrin Bank on Rating Watch Negative.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sparql+axioms run 3
No. Orrin Bank (E06) went on Rating Watch Negative at A- (A17), with no rating change.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sparql+axioms run 4
No. A17 placed Orrin Bank on Rating Watch Negative and kept the rating at A-.
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}
sparql+axioms run 5
No. The only 2026 action for E06 was a Rating Watch Negative at an unchanged A- (A17).
JSON: {"downgraded": "no"}