Q43, run 2026-11-04-1738-sonnet-query

← back to the run

How many distinct entities are domiciled in Luxembourg (LU)?

Tests: Local rule: the RESEARCH record's country is overruled by the RATINGS record's.

Expected: count = 0

✅ D1 sql run 1 graded by code · query session

0. The only LU record, E17, is the same legal entity as E10, which is DE-domiciled.

JSON: {"count": 0}

✅ D1 sql run 2 graded by code · query session

0. The only LU record, E17, is a duplicate of the DE entity E10.

JSON: {"count": 0}

✅ D1 sql run 3 graded by code · query session

0. The only LU record is E17, which duplicates E10 (LEI 391200QYPVFF2O9K2039); that entity is domiciled in DE per E10.

JSON: {"count": 0}

✅ D1 sql run 4 graded by code · query session

0. The only LU record, E17, duplicates E10, which is domiciled in DE. This is a judgement call, since counting E17 would give 1.

JSON: {"count": 0}

✅ D1 sql run 5 graded by code · query session

0. The only LU record, E17, is the same entity as E10, which is domiciled in DE.

JSON: {"count": 0}

❌ D2 sql+markdown run 1 graded by code · query session

1. The only LU record is E17, which duplicates E10.

JSON: {"count": 1}

Why: count: expected 0, got 1

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 2 graded by code · query session

0. The only LU record is E17, which is a duplicate of E10, and RATINGS says E10 is in DE.

JSON: {"count": 0}

❌ D2 sql+markdown run 3 graded by code · query session

1. Only E17, which is the RESEARCH duplicate of E10, is in LU, and the RATINGS record holds DE.

JSON: {"count": 1}

Why: count: expected 0, got 1

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 4 graded by code · query session

0. The only LU record is E17, which is the same entity as E10, domiciled in DE per RATINGS.

JSON: {"count": 0}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 5 graded by code · query session

0. The only LU record is E17, which is the same entity as E10, and the RATINGS record puts E10 in DE.

JSON: {"count": 0}

❌ D4 sparql run 1 graded by code · query session

1, counting distinct LEIs.

JSON: {"count": 1}

Why: count: expected 0, got 1

✅ D4 sparql run 2 graded by code · query session

0. The only LU record is E17, which is a duplicate of the DE entity E10. If you count records instead, the answer is 1.

JSON: {"count": 0}

✅ D4 sparql run 3 graded by code · query session

0. The only LU record is E17, which duplicates E10 (domiciled in DE). Counting the record instead would give 1.

JSON: {"count": 0}

✅ D4 sparql run 4 graded by code · query session

0. The only LU record, E17, shares its LEI with E10, which is domiciled in DE. Counted by record, it would be 1.

JSON: {"count": 0}

❌ D4 sparql run 5 graded by code · query session

1. Only the record E17 is LU, and it appears to duplicate E10, so this depends on whether duplicates count.

JSON: {"count": 1}

Why: count: expected 0, got 1

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 1 graded by code · query session

0. The only LU record is E17, which is the same entity as E10 (DE per RATINGS).

JSON: {"count": 0}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 2 graded by code · query session

0. The only LU record is E17, and the RATINGS record for that entity says DE.

JSON: {"count": 0}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 3 graded by code · query session

0. The only LU record is E17, and the RATINGS record for the same LEI (E10) says DE.

JSON: {"count": 0}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 4 graded by code · query session

0. The only LU record is E17, and the RATINGS record for the same LEI says DE.

JSON: {"count": 0}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 5 graded by code · query session

0. The only LU record is E17, which is E10 and is domiciled in DE per RATINGS.

JSON: {"count": 0}