Q3, run 2026-11-04-1738-sonnet-query
Is Kestrel Energy's 2031 note investment grade?
Tests: Issuer versus instrument rating: a subordinated instrument is notched below the issuer.
Expected: investment_grade = no rating = BB+
sql run 1
No. I02 (the 2031 note) was cut to BB+ by A07 on 2025-06-20, which is sub-investment grade.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sql run 2
No. I02 (the 2031 note) was cut to BB+ by A07, which is sub-investment grade.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sql run 3
No, it is BB+. Note I02 was cut from BBB to BB+ on 2025-06-20 (A07), which is below investment grade.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sql run 4
No. The 2031 note I02 is subordinated and was cut to BB+ by A07, which is below investment grade.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sql run 5
No. The 2031 note I02 was cut to BB+ on 2025-06-20 (A07), which is sub-investment grade.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sql+markdown run 1
No, it is rated BB+. I02 is subordinated, and its latest rating is BB+ (A07).
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sql+markdown run 2
No. The 2031 note I02 is subordinated and was downgraded to BB+ (A07), which is speculative grade.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sql+markdown run 3
No, BB+. Note I02 is subordinated and was cut to BB+ by A07 on 2025-06-20.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sql+markdown run 4
No, it is BB+. The 2031 note (I02) is subordinated and was downgraded to BB+ by A07.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sql+markdown run 5
No. The 2031 note (I02) is subordinated and was downgraded to BB+ on 2025-06-20 (A07), which is speculative grade.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sparql run 1
No. The 2031 note (I02) was downgraded to BB+ on 2025-06-20 (A07), which is sub-investment grade.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sparql run 2
No. The 2031 note (I02) is rated BB+ (A07, 2025-06-20), which is below investment grade.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sparql run 3
No. I02 (the 2031 note) was cut to BB+ in A07, which is below investment grade.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sparql run 4
No, BB+. I02 was cut to BB+ on 2025-06-20 (A07), which is sub-investment grade.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sparql run 5
No, BB+. I02 was downgraded from BBB to BB+ on 2025-06-20 (A07), which is sub-investment grade.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sparql+ontology run 1
No. The 2031 note is I02 (subordinated) and has been rated BB+ since A07 on 2025-06-20, which is speculative grade.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sparql+ontology run 2
No. The 2031 note (I02) is subordinated and was downgraded to BB+ by A07 on 2025-06-20, which is speculative grade.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sparql+ontology run 3
No. The 2031 note (I02) is subordinated and was downgraded to BB+ by A07 on 2025-06-20, which is speculative grade.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sparql+ontology run 4
No, it is BB+. The 2031 note (I02) is subordinated and was downgraded to BB+ on 2025-06-20 (A07).
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}
sparql+ontology run 5
No, BB+. I02 is subordinated and was downgraded to BB+ by A07.
JSON: {"investment_grade": "no", "rating": "BB+"}