Q40, run 2026-11-05-1234-sonnet

← back to the run

Which source is in the highest tier?

Tests: Local code: K3 is the highest tier, not K1.

Expected: source = S01

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

S01, under the same assumption. If K0 were the top tier it would be S04.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

S01 (K3), under the same assumption that a higher K number means a higher tier.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

S01 (K3), assuming a higher K number means a higher tier. The data does not state the tier direction, and K0 could instead be the top.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

S01. This assumes a higher K number is a higher tier, which the data does not state.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

S01 (K3). The data does not define the tier scale, so I assumed that a higher K number is a higher tier.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

Ambiguous for the same reason. S01 is the only K3 source and S04 is the only K0 source. I give S01 on the reading that K3 is highest.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

S01 (tier K3). The data does not define the tier direction, so this assumes a higher number is a higher tier.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

S01, under the same assumption that K3 is highest.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

❌ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

Undetermined, for the same reason. It is S01 (K3) or S04 (K0).

JSON: {"source": null}

Why: source: expected S01, got None

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

S01, the only K3 source. The data gives no explicit tier ranking, so I read a higher number as a higher tier.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

S01 (K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

S01 (tier K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

S01 (K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

S01 (K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

S01.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

S01 (K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

S01 (K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

S01 (K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

S01 (K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

S01 (K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

S01.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

S01.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

S01.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

S01.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

S01 (K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

S01 (K3), if K3 is highest.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

S01 (K3), under the higher-number-is-higher assumption.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

❌ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

S04 (K0), assuming a lower number means a higher tier. The data does not confirm that.

JSON: {"source": "S04"}

Why: source: expected S01, got S04

❌ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

The data doesn't say whether K0 or K3 is the top tier. I give S04 (K0) provisionally. If K3 is the top, it is S01.

JSON: {"source": "S04"}

Why: source: expected S01, got S04

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

S01, assuming a larger number means a higher tier. The data does not define the order. If K0 were the top tier, it would be S04.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

S01 (tier_rank 1).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

S01 (rank 1).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

S01, which has tier rank 1.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

S01, which has tier_rank 1.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

S01, which has tier_rank 1.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}