Q33, run 2026-11-05-1234-sonnet

← back to the run

Which of Kesting University's research works has the most citations?

Tests: Local rule: STG records are test data; with them W22 would lead.

Expected: work = W20

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

❌ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W20 has 3).

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations against 2 for W21 and 1 for W22. This count excludes W90–W92, which cite W22, because they are staging (STG) records.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

❌ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92). W20 has 3.

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92).

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92).

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

W22. It has 4 citations, from W34, W90, W91 and W92, which include Kesting self-citations.

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations. W22 has only W34 once the STG citers W90–W92 are set aside.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations (W32, W35, W36).

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations (W32, W35, W36). W22 would lead if the staging citations W90–W92 were counted.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}