Q25, run 2026-11-05-1234-sonnet

← back to the run

What is the total of the citation counts of Lena Vossberg's research works?

Tests: Retractions and test records: W23's citation (W39) doesn't count, nor do the STG works citing W22.

Expected: count = 6

❌ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

7. W20 has 3, W21 has 2, W22 has 1 (W34) and W23 has 1.

JSON: {"count": 7}

Why: count: expected 6, got 7

❌ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

10. W20 has 3 citations, W21 has 2, W22 has 4 (including the staging works W90–W92) and W23 has 1.

JSON: {"count": 10}

Why: count: expected 6, got 10

❌ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

7. W20 has 3 citations, W21 has 2, W22 has 1 and W23 has 1. I ignored citations from the staging records W90–W92.

JSON: {"count": 7}

Why: count: expected 6, got 7

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 citations (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36) and W22 has 1 (W34). I excluded the staging works W90–W92.

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 citations, W21 has 2 and W22 has 1 (from W34).

JSON: {"count": 6}

❌ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

10: W20 has 3, W21 has 2, W22 has 4, W23 has 1.

JSON: {"count": 10}

Why: count: expected 6, got 10

❌ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

10. The citation counts are W20 = 3, W21 = 2, W22 = 4 and W23 = 1.

JSON: {"count": 10}

Why: count: expected 6, got 10

❌ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

11. W20 has 3, W21 has 3, W22 has 4 and W23 has 1.

JSON: {"count": 11}

Why: count: expected 6, got 11

❌ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

9. W20 has 3 citations, W21 has 2 and W22 has 4.

JSON: {"count": 9}

Why: count: expected 6, got 9

❌ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

10. W20 has 3, W21 has 2, W22 has 4 and W23 has 1.

JSON: {"count": 10}

Why: count: expected 6, got 10

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 citations (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36) and W22 has 1 (W34), since the staging citations from W90–W92 are ignored.

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 citations (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36) and W22 has 1 (W34). The W90–W92 citations are staging records and are ignored.

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36) and W22 has 1 (W34). The staging records W90–W92 are ignored.

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 citations (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36), and W22 has 1 (W34). The citations from W90–W92 are staging records and are ignored.

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 citations (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36) and W22 has 1 (W34). The staging citations are ignored.

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36) and W22 has 1 (W34), because W90–92 are staging records and are ignored.

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 citations (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36) and W22 has 1 (W34). The staging citations from W90–92 are ignored.

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 citations (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36) and W22 has 1 (W34). The staging citations from W90–92 are ignored.

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 citations, W21 has 2 and W22 has 1. The citations from W90–W92 are staging records and are ignored.

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

6. W20 is cited by W32, W35, W36 (3), W21 by W33, W36 (2), and W22 by W34 (1). W90–W92 are staging records, so they are ignored.

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 citations (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36), and W22 has 1 (W34). W91 and W92 are staging records.

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

6: W20 has 3 (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36), W22 has 1 (W34). The staging citers W90–W92 are ignored.

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 citations (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36), and W22 has 1 (W34). W90–92 are staging records and are ignored.

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 citations (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36) and W22 has 1 (W34). The staging citers are ignored.

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36) and W22 has 1 (W34). The citations from the staging records W90–92 are ignored.

JSON: {"count": 6}

❌ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

7. W20 has 3 (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36), W22 has 1 (W34), and W23 has 1 (W39).

JSON: {"count": 7}

Why: count: expected 6, got 7

❌ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

7. W20 has 3, W21 has 2, W22 has 1 and W23 has 1. The count would be 10 if the STG records W90-W92 were included.

JSON: {"count": 7}

Why: count: expected 6, got 7

❌ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

7. W20 has 3 citations, W21 has 2, W22 has 1 (W34) and W23 has 1 (W39).

JSON: {"count": 7}

Why: count: expected 6, got 7

❌ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

7. W20 has 3 citations (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36), W22 has 1 (W34) and W23 has 1 (W39).

JSON: {"count": 7}

Why: count: expected 6, got 7

❌ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

7 (W20 has 3, W21 has 2, W22 has 1, W23 has 1). This leaves out citations from the staging records W90–W92.

JSON: {"count": 7}

Why: count: expected 6, got 7

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 citations (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36) and W22 has 1 (W34).

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

6, from W20 with 3, W21 with 2 and W22 with 1.

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 citations (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36) and W22 has 1 (W34).

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

6. W20 has 3 citations (W32, W35, W36), W21 has 2 (W33, W36) and W22 has 1 (W34).

JSON: {"count": 6}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

6 (W20 has 3, W21 has 2, W22 has 1).

JSON: {"count": 6}