Q48, run 2026-11-04-1752-haiku

← back to the run

Why is W70 not one of the University of Albury's research works, though its author lists the Tessel Laboratory?

Tests: Local rules: the last-listed affiliation, and affiliated institutes.

Expected: Tomasz Wierzba lists the Tessel Laboratory first and the Halloran Institute second; the house rule credits the last-listed one, Halloran. Halloran is an affiliated institute (AFF): its parent link is an agreement, so its works are not the University of Albury's.

❌ R1 csv run 1 graded by llm

The premise is false. W70 lists I04 (Tessel) and I06 (Halloran), both descendants of I02 (University of Albury). It is therefore one of Albury's research works, and it is counted in Q9 and Q10.

Why: Rejects the premise; the checklist says only the last-listed affiliation counts (Halloran) and Halloran is an affiliated institute, not a unit, so W70 does not roll up to Albury

❌ R1 csv run 2 graded by llm

The premise is wrong. W70 is credited to I04 (Tessel), which sits under I03 → I02 (University of Albury), and also to I06 (Halloran, under I02), so it is one of Albury's research works.

Why: Rejects the premise; the key says only the last-listed affiliation counts (Halloran Institute), and as an affiliated institute not a unit it doesn't roll up to Albury.

❌ R1 csv run 3 graded by llm

The premise is wrong. W70 is credited to the University of Albury: I04 (Tessel) sits under I03 and I02, and I06 sits directly under I02, so W70 counts in Q9.

Why: Claims W70 is credited to Albury, contradicting the key: only the last-listed affiliation (Halloran Institute) counts, and it is an affiliated institute, not a unit, so it doesn't roll up.

❌ R1 csv run 4 graded by llm

The premise is wrong. W70 is credited to I04 and I06, both Albury units, so it is one of the University of Albury's research works (counted in Q6 and Q9). It is dated 2023, so it is not in the 2024 counts.

Why: Rejects the premise, whereas the checklist says only the last-listed affiliation counts so W70 goes to the Halloran Institute, an affiliated institute that does not roll up to Albury.

❌ R1 csv run 5 graded by llm

The premise is wrong: W70 is credited to I06 (Halloran Institute), which is a unit under University of Albury (I02), so it is in Albury's count. It is also credited to I04 (Tessel Laboratory).

Why: Contradicts the key: only the last-listed affiliation counts so W70 goes to Halloran Institute, an affiliated institute not a unit, so it doesn't roll up to Albury.

❌ R2 rdf run 1 graded by llm

The premise is wrong. Tessel Laboratory (I04) has parent I03, which has parent I02, so W70 rolls up to the University of Albury and is counted in Q9.

Why: Answer rejects the premise and says W70 rolls up to Albury; the key says only the last-listed affiliation counts, so it goes to the Halloran Institute, an affiliated institute that does not roll up.

❌ R2 rdf run 2 graded by llm

The premise is false. W70 is credited to I04 (Tessel, under I03 → I02) and to I06 (Halloran, under I02), and it is an ART, so it is one of Albury's research works (counted in Q9).

Why: Rejects the premise and says W70 counts for Albury, contradicting the key (last-listed affiliation only, Halloran is an affiliated institute not a unit)

❌ R2 rdf run 3 graded by llm

The premise is wrong. W70 is credited to I06 (Halloran, a unit of I02) as well as to I04 (Tessel → I03 → I02), so it is counted in Albury's totals (Q9).

Why: Rejects the premise and claims W70 counts for Albury; the key says only the last-listed affiliation counts, crediting Halloran, an affiliated institute that doesn't roll up.

❌ R2 rdf run 4 graded by llm

The premise is false. The Tessel Laboratory (I04) has parent I03, whose parent is I02 (University of Albury), so W70 is credited to Albury through I04 (and also through I06). It is counted in Q9.



The JSON covers Q1–Q46, the questions in your specification. Q47 and Q48 are answered in the text only.

Why: The answer rejects the premise and credits W70 to Albury via Tessel. The key says only the last-listed affiliation counts, so W70 goes to the Halloran Institute, an affiliated institute that does not roll up to Albury.

❌ R2 rdf run 5 graded by llm

The premise is false. A08 of W70 lists I04 (Tessel Laboratory), which is a unit of the University of Albury (I04 → I03 → I02), so W70 is credited to Albury and is counted in Q9.

Q47 and Q48 have no field in the specified JSON schema, so they are answered in text only.

Why: Answer says W70 is credited to Albury via Tessel; checklist says only the last-listed affiliation counts, crediting Halloran Institute, an affiliated institute that doesn't roll up to Albury.

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by llm

W70 lists two affiliations, and the house rule credits only the last one listed (seq 2, Halloran Institute, I06). Halloran is an affiliated institute, not a unit of the University of Albury, so the Tessel Laboratory (seq 1, I04) is ignored in every count.

🟡 R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by llm

The house rule credits only the last-listed affiliation. W70's A08 lists I04 first and I06 second, so only I06 is credited, and I06 is affiliated, so its parent link to I02 is not followed.

Why: Says only the last-listed affiliation counts and that I06 is affiliated so the parent link is not followed, but uses codes (I06, I02) rather than naming the Halloran Institute and University of Albury, and doesn't state that it is an affiliated institute rather than a unit in those terms.

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by llm

W70's author A08 lists I04 (Tessel, a unit of Albury) as seq 1 and I06 (Halloran) as seq 2. The house rule credits only the last affiliation, so W70 is credited to I06, which is an affiliated institute and not an Albury unit.

Q47 and Q48 have no slots in the JSON schema, which covers Q1–Q46 only.

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by llm

A08's affiliations on W70 are I04 (sequence 1) and I06 (sequence 2). The house rule credits only the last-listed affiliation, I06, which is an affiliated institute and whose parent link is not followed, so the Tessel Laboratory credit is ignored.



The schema lists fields only for Q1–Q46, so Q47 and Q48 are answered in prose only.

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by llm

W70's author A08 lists I04 (Tessel) first but I06 (Halloran) second. Only the last affiliation is credited, and Halloran is an affiliated institute (AFF), not a unit of Albury, so W70 is not an Albury work.

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by llm

W70's author A08 lists two affiliations, I04 (seq 1) and I06 (seq 2). Only the last-listed affiliation counts, so the Tessel Lab (I04) is ignored, and I06 is an affiliated institute, not a unit of I02, so the Albury credit does not pass to it.

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by llm

A08's affiliations on W70 are I04 (seq 1) and I06 (seq 2). Only the last-listed affiliation is credited, so the work goes to I06, an affiliated institute that does not roll up to I02 or I01.

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by llm

A08 lists two affiliations on W70: I04 (sequence 1) and I06 (sequence 2). The house rule credits only the last-listed affiliation, I06, which is an affiliated institute (AFF) whose parent link does not make it a unit of I02, so W70 is not credited to Albury.

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by llm

Because A08 listed two affiliations on W70, and the house rule credits only the last-listed one. That is I06, the Halloran Institute, an affiliated institute (AFF) whose parent link is an agreement, not membership, so it doesn't roll up to the University of Albury. The Tessel Laboratory (I04) was listed first and is ignored.

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by llm

A08 lists two affiliations on W70 and the house rule credits only the last one. That is Halloran (I06, seq 2), not Tessel (I04, seq 1), and Halloran is an affiliated institute whose works never roll up to the University of Albury.

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by llm

W70's affiliation list has I04 (Tessel) at seq 1 and I06 (Halloran) at seq 2. Only the last-listed affiliation counts, so the work goes to I06. I06 is an affiliated institute, so it is not a unit of I02 and does not pass credit up to I02 or I01.

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by llm

W70's author A08 lists two affiliations: I04 at seq 1 and I06 at seq 2. Only the last-listed affiliation counts, so W70 is credited to I06, an affiliated institute outside the University of Albury's unit tree.

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by llm

W70's author A08 lists I04 (seq 1) and I06 (seq 2). The house rule credits only the last-listed affiliation, I06, which is an affiliated institute whose parent link does not make it a unit, so the work never rolls up to I04, I02 or I01.

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by llm

On W70, A08 lists I04 at sequence 1 and I06 at sequence 2. Only the last-listed affiliation is credited, which is I06 (Halloran, an affiliated institute), and affiliated institutes never count toward their parent, so the Tessel Laboratory credit is ignored.

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by llm

A08 lists I04 first and I06 second on W70. The house rule credits only the last affiliation, I06, which is an affiliated institute and so does not roll up to I02. W70 therefore is not credited to Albury, even though the Tessel Laboratory (I04) appears on the record.

❌ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by llm

The premise is false. W70 is credited to I04 (Tessel Laboratory → I03 → I02), and to I06 (Halloran → I02). Both are in the University of Albury tree, so W70 is one of its research works and is included in the Q9 count of 13.

Why: Rejects the premise and says W70 is in Albury's tree, contradicting the key that only the last-listed affiliation (Halloran, an affiliated institute not a unit) counts so W70 is not Albury's

❌ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by llm

The premise is wrong. W70 is credited to I04 (Tessel), which sits under I03 and I02, and also to I06 (Halloran), which sits under I02. It is an ART in 2023, so it is in Albury's output (Q9).

Why: Rejects the premise and says W70 counts for Albury; the checklist says only the last-listed affiliation counts, so it is credited to Halloran, which is an affiliated institute not rolling up to Albury, so neither point is met.

❌ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by llm

The premise is false: W70 is an Albury work. Its affiliations are I04 (Tessel, under I03 and I02) and I06 (Halloran, under I02), both within the University of Albury subtree.

Why: Rejects the premise and says W70 is an Albury work, contradicting the key: only the last-listed affiliation counts (Halloran Institute), and as an affiliated institute it does not roll up to Albury.

❌ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by llm

(Also not in the schema.) The premise is wrong. W70 is credited to the University of Albury through both I04 (Tessel, a unit under I03 and I02) and I06 (Halloran, a unit of I02), so it is one of the 13 works in Q9.

Q47 and Q48 have no fields in the schema, so they are not in the JSON.

Why: It rejects the premise and credits W70 to Albury, but the key says only the last-listed affiliation counts, so W70 goes to Halloran, an affiliated institute that doesn't roll up to Albury.

❌ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by llm

The premise is false: W70 is credited to Albury. Its author A08 is affiliated with Tessel (I04), which sits under I03 and I02, so the work is already in the Albury subtree; it is also credited to Halloran (I06), which sits under I02.

Why: Answer rejects the premise and says W70 is credited to Albury, contradicting the key (only last-listed affiliation counts, so it goes to Halloran, an affiliated institute that doesn't roll up to Albury); neither checklist point is met.