Q26, run 2026-11-04-1752-haiku

← back to the run

Does W23 count towards Kesting University's research output?

Tests: Retractions: a retracted work is not research output.

Expected: counts = no

❌ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

Yes. W23 is an ART credited to I07 and is not excluded by type. The data does not say retracted works are excluded from output.

JSON: {"counts": "yes"}

Why: counts: expected no, got yes

❌ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

Depends. W23 is an article (ART), so it fits the research types, but the data doesn't say whether retracted works are excluded from research output.

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends

❌ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

Depends. W23 is type ART but flagged is_retracted=true, and the data does not say whether retracted works count as output.

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends

❌ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

Depends. W23 is typed ART and sits in I07 units, but it is flagged retracted, and the data does not say whether retracted works count as output.

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends

❌ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

Depends. W23 is an ART record flagged is_retracted=true, and the data does not say whether retracted works are excluded from output.

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends

❌ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

Yes. W23 is an ART credited to I07 via A09. The data's research test is document type (see Q17), and it does not exclude retracted works, though this is an interpretation.

JSON: {"counts": "yes"}

Why: counts: expected no, got yes

❌ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

Depends. W23 is an ART and so counts by type, but it is flagged `retracted true`, and the data doesn't say whether retracted works are excluded.

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends

❌ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

Yes. W23 is an ART credited to I07, and the data's research-output rule is based on document type, not the retraction flag. If retracted works were excluded, it would drop out.

JSON: {"counts": "yes"}

Why: counts: expected no, got yes

❌ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

Depends. W23 is an ART (research type) but is flagged retracted, and the data does not say whether retracted works count as output.

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends

❌ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

Depends. W23 is an article credited to I07 via A09, but it is flagged as retracted, and the data does not say whether retracted works leave research output.

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is left out of every count of works.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is excluded from every count of works.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is left out of every count of works.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output and is excluded from every count.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted (is_retracted = true), so it is not research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted (is_retracted = true), so it is not research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is excluded from all counts of works.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted and retracted works are excluded from Kesting's research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is excluded from every count.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

❌ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

Depends. W23 is an ART record, so it counts under the type rule. However, it is flagged is_retracted=true and the data gives no rule for excluding retracted works. Excluding it would give 9 for Kesting.

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends

❌ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

Yes. W23 is an ART by A09 (I07), so it counts under the document-type rule. Its retraction flag would change this only if retracted works were excluded.

JSON: {"counts": "yes"}

Why: counts: expected no, got yes

❌ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

Depends. W23 is type ART, so it passes the type test, but it is flagged is_retracted = true, and the data does not say whether retracted works are excluded.

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends

❌ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

Depends. W23 is type ART but flagged is_retracted = true, and the data has no rule on whether retracted works count.

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends

❌ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

Depends. By type W23 is ART and counts in Q11, but it is flagged is_retracted=true, and the data does not say whether retracted works count.

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends