Q17, run 2026-11-04-1752-haiku

← back to the run

Which of Mara Ellison's works are not research output because of their document type?

Tests: Document types: an editorial and an erratum, under two author records.

Expected: works = ['W04', 'W05']

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

W04 and W05. W04 is EDT (editorial) and W05 is ERR (erratum).

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

W04 and W05. These are an editorial (EDT) and an erratum (ERR).

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

W04 (EDT) and W05 (ERR).

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

W04 (EDT) and W05 (ERR).

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

W04 (EDT) and W05 (ERR). Both are Mara Ellison works excluded by document type.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

W04 (EDT) and W05 (ERR) are A01's non-research works.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

W04 (EDT) and W05 (ERR). A01's other works are ART, and A02's and A03's are PPR or ART.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

W04 (editorial) and W05 (erratum), because of their EDT and ERR types.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

W04 (EDT) and W05 (ERR), the only two of Mara Ellison's works with non-research types.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

W04 (EDT) and W05 (ERR).

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

W04 (editorial) and W05 (erratum). W07 is excluded for its source, not its type.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

W04 and W05. These are an editorial and an erratum, which are excluded by type. W02 is a preprint, which is research type, and W07 is excluded by its delisted source, not its type.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

W04 (editorial) and W05 (erratum). W07 is excluded for its delisted source, not its type.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

W04 and W05. These are an editorial (EDT) and an erratum (ERR). W07 is excluded for its source, not its type, and W02 is a preprint, which is a research type.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

W04 and W05. They are an editorial and an erratum. W07 is excluded by its source (S04, K0), not its type.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

W04 (editorial) and W05 (erratum). These are the only works of Mara Ellison's that fail on document type.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

W04 (editorial) and W05 (erratum). W02 is not excluded by type; it is excluded as a preprint of W03.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

W04 and W05. These are an editorial (EDT) and an erratum (ERR), which are not research types. W07 is excluded for its delisted source, not its type.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

W04 (editorial) and W05 (erratum). They are excluded by their document type, unlike W07, which is excluded because its source is delisted.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

W04 (editorial) and W05 (erratum). W07 is excluded for its delisted source, not its type.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

W04 (editorial) and W05 (erratum). W07 is excluded for its delisted source, not its type.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

W04 and W05. W04 is an editorial and W05 is an erratum, so neither is research output by type. (W07 is excluded for its source, not its type.)

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

W04, W05. These are an editorial (EDT) and an erratum (ERR), which are not research output by type; W07 is excluded for source instead.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

W04, W05. These are the editorial (EDT) and erratum (ERR) records, which are not research output by type.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

W04 (editorial) and W05 (erratum).

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

W04 (EDT, editorial) and W05 (ERR, erratum). I treat ART, PPR, REV and SUP as research output. EDT, ERR and PTX are not.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

W04 (EDT) and W05 (ERR).

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

W04 and W05. These are an editorial (EDT) and an erratum (ERR); Mara's other works are ART or PPR.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

W04 (editorial) and W05 (erratum).

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

W04 (editorial) and W05 (erratum). Each has a non-research type. The rest of Mara Ellison's records (A01, A02, A03) are research types.

JSON: {"works": ["W04", "W05"]}