Q46, run 2026-11-04-1712-sonnet

← back to the run

Does Halden Leasing have an issuer rating?

Tests: Local type: a credit opinion (CO) is not a rating.

Expected: issuer_rating = no

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a "CO" rating-type record (A46), not an issuer rating (LTIDR or STIDR).

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

No. E11 only has a CO-type rating (A46), not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

No. E11 only has a "CO" rating (A46), which is not an issuer default rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a "CO" record (A46), and the data doesn't define that type. There is no LTIDR for E11.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a "CO" rating (A46), not an LTIDR or other issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has no issuer rating. I05's rating reflects the guarantor E10.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has no ratings of its own. I05 is rated and E10 is the guarantor.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has no issuer rating. I05's rating comes from its guarantor E10.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has no ratings of its own; I05's rating (A29) is an instrument rating that reflects E10's credit risk.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has no issuer rating. Its note I05 takes E10's credit risk.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}