Q19, run 2026-11-06-0519-sonnet-query

← back to the run

How many distinct works cite "Drift-aware mapping with low-cost sonar", in either of its versions?

Tests: Versions: citations to the preprint W02 and to W03 are citations of one work; W15 cites both and counts once.

Expected: count = 27

❌ D1 sql run 1 graded by code · query session

30. W02 (the preprint) has 9 citing works and W03 has 26, with 5 in common.

JSON: {"count": 30}

Why: count: expected 27, got 30

❌ D1 sql run 2 graded by code · query session

30 distinct works cite W02 or W03.

JSON: {"count": 30}

Why: count: expected 27, got 30

❌ D1 sql run 3 graded by code · query session

30 distinct citing works.

JSON: {"count": 30}

Why: count: expected 27, got 30

❌ D1 sql run 4 graded by code · query session

30.

JSON: {"count": 30}

Why: count: expected 27, got 30

❌ D1 sql run 5 graded by code · query session

30 distinct works cite W02 or W03.

JSON: {"count": 30}

Why: count: expected 27, got 30

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 1 graded by code · query session

27. These are the distinct works citing W03 or its preprint W02, counted once.

JSON: {"count": 27}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 2 graded by code · query session

27. I counted citations of W03, which stands for both W02 and W03.

JSON: {"count": 27}

❌ D2 sql+markdown run 3 graded by code · query session

6. This counts distinct works citing W03 or its preprint W02.

JSON: {"count": 6}

Why: count: expected 27, got 6

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 4 graded by code · query session

27. These are the distinct non-staging, non-retracted works that cite W03 or its preprint W02.

JSON: {"count": 27}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 5 graded by code · query session

27. Citing works are counted once across W02 and W03.

JSON: {"count": 27}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 1 graded by code · query session

27.

JSON: {"count": 27}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 2 graded by code · query session

27 distinct citing works, counting citations to both W02 and W03.

JSON: {"count": 27}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 3 graded by code · query session

27 distinct citing works of W03, the merged record of W02 and W03.

JSON: {"count": 27}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 4 graded by code · query session

27, counting citations of both W02 and W03 (merged as W03).

JSON: {"count": 27}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 5 graded by code · query session

27 distinct works cite W03, the merged record of W02 and W03.

JSON: {"count": 27}

❌ D4 sparql run 1 graded by code · query session

30 distinct works cite W02 or W03.

JSON: {"count": 30}

Why: count: expected 27, got 30

❌ D4 sparql run 2 graded by code · query session

30 distinct citing works across W02 and W03.

JSON: {"count": 30}

Why: count: expected 27, got 30

❌ D4 sparql run 3 graded by code · query session

30.

JSON: {"count": 30}

Why: count: expected 27, got 30

❌ D4 sparql run 4 graded by code · query session

30.

JSON: {"count": 30}

Why: count: expected 27, got 30

❌ D4 sparql run 5 graded by code · query session

30. W02 has 9 citing works and W03 has 26, with 5 in common (W15, W315, W397, W535, W843).

JSON: {"count": 30}

Why: count: expected 27, got 30

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 1 graded by code · query session

27. W02 and W03 together have 30 citing records. I excluded the staging records W397 and W569 and the retracted W973.

JSON: {"count": 27}

❌ D5 sparql+ontology run 2 graded by code · query session

30, the union of the citers of W02 and W03. I could not check every large-ID citer for retraction or K0 status.

JSON: {"count": 30}

Why: count: expected 27, got 30

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 3 graded by code · query session

27. These are the valid citers of W03 and its preprint W02.

JSON: {"count": 27}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 4 graded by code · query session

27 distinct citing works, counted across W02 and W03.

JSON: {"count": 27}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 5 graded by code · query session

27. These are the distinct non-staging, non-retracted, non-K0 works citing W02 or W03.

JSON: {"count": 27}