Q32, run 2026-11-06-0206-sonnet

← back to the run

How many distinct works are within two citation hops of W01 (citing it, or citing a work that cites it)?

Tests: Two hops, counted once each.

Expected: count = 17

❌ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

18, made up of 7 direct citers and 11 second-hop works.

JSON: {"count": 18}

Why: count: expected 17, got 18

❌ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

20 (8 direct citers plus 12 further works).

JSON: {"count": 20}

Why: count: expected 17, got 20

❌ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

20. These are W01's 8 direct citers plus 12 further works.

JSON: {"count": 20}

Why: count: expected 17, got 20

❌ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

20, excluding W01 itself.

JSON: {"count": 20}

Why: count: expected 17, got 20

❌ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

18. The citing works are W40, W41, W229, W602, W657, W660 and W895. The second-hop works are the Q31 list minus W895.

JSON: {"count": 18}

Why: count: expected 17, got 18

❌ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

18. Seven works cite W01 directly and 12 more cite those, with W895 in both groups.

JSON: {"count": 18}

Why: count: expected 17, got 18

❌ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

18 works.

JSON: {"count": 18}

Why: count: expected 17, got 18

❌ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

18. This is the 7 direct citers plus 11 second-hop works.

JSON: {"count": 18}

Why: count: expected 17, got 18

❌ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

18 distinct works: 7 direct citers of W01 plus 11 further works that cite those citers.

JSON: {"count": 18}

Why: count: expected 17, got 18

❌ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

20. The 8 direct citers plus the second-hop citers, with W844 and W895 in both groups.

JSON: {"count": 20}

Why: count: expected 17, got 20

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

17. There are 7 direct citers of W01 and 11 second-hop citers, with W895 in both.

JSON: {"count": 17}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

17. Seven works cite W01 directly (W40, W41, W229, W602, W657, W660, W895) and ten more cite those.

JSON: {"count": 17}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

17. That is 7 direct citers of W01 plus 10 further works one hop out.

JSON: {"count": 17}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

17: the 7 direct citers plus 10 further works, with W895 in both groups.

JSON: {"count": 17}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

17. There are 7 direct citers (W40, W41, W229, W602, W657, W660, W895) and 11 second-hop works, with W895 in both groups.

JSON: {"count": 17}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

17. That is the 7 direct citers of W01 plus 10 second-hop works.

JSON: {"count": 17}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

17. W01 has 7 valid direct citers and 10 more at the second hop. W844 and W90 are STG and W922 is retracted.

JSON: {"count": 17}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

17: 7 works citing W01 directly and 10 more at the second hop.

JSON: {"count": 17}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

17. That is the 7 direct citers plus 10 further works.

JSON: {"count": 17}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

17. There are 7 direct citers of W01 plus 10 works at the second hop.

JSON: {"count": 17}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

17.

JSON: {"count": 17}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

17 (the 7 works citing W01 plus 10 more, with W895 in both).

JSON: {"count": 17}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

17 works. 7 cite W01 directly and 11 cite one of those, with W895 in both groups.

JSON: {"count": 17}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

17. W01 has 7 direct citers and 11 two-hop citers, and W895 appears in both groups.

JSON: {"count": 17}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

17. That is the 7 direct citers plus 10 further works that cite them; W895 falls in both groups.

JSON: {"count": 17}