Q36, run 2026-11-06-0206-haiku

← back to the run

How many research works appeared in the Proceedings of the Hydrodynamics Forum (S06)?

Tests: Local code: both SUP works count; the foreword (EDT) doesn't.

Expected: count = 36

❌ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

26. Hand-tallied S06 ART/REV records.

JSON: {"count": 26}

Why: count: expected 36, got 26

❌ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

About 25 research works, from a manual scan of S06 records. Editorial, supplement, front-matter and erratum records are excluded.

JSON: {"count": 25}

Why: count: expected 36, got 25

❌ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

23 research works in the Proceedings of the Hydrodynamics Forum (S06).

JSON: {"count": 23}

Why: count: expected 36, got 23

❌ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

❌ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

(no answer found)

JSON: {"count": 24}

Why: count: expected 36, got 24

❌ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

29 research works appeared in S06.

JSON: {"count": 29}

Why: count: expected 36, got 29

❌ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

26 research works.

JSON: {"count": 26}

Why: count: expected 36, got 26

❌ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

24 research works appeared in S06.

JSON: {"count": 24}

Why: count: expected 36, got 24

❌ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

24 research works in S06.

JSON: {"count": 24}

Why: count: expected 36, got 24

❌ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

23 research works appeared in S06 (approximate).

JSON: {"count": 23}

Why: count: expected 36, got 23

❌ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

34 research works in the Proceedings of the Hydrodynamics Forum (S06): 22 articles, 10 supplement articles and 2 reviews, after excluding editorials, front matter and the erratum. This was also a manual scan.

JSON: {"count": 34}

Why: count: expected 36, got 34

❌ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

❌ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

31 research works in the Proceedings of the Hydrodynamics Forum (S06), all years.

JSON: {"count": 31}

Why: count: expected 36, got 31

❌ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

❌ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

34*. Counted over research works in S06.

JSON: {"count": 34}

Why: count: expected 36, got 34

❌ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

❌ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

35. This is the count of research works in S06, excluding editorials, the erratum and STG records. It was tallied by hand and may be slightly off.

JSON: {"count": 35}

Why: count: expected 36, got 35

❌ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

≈31 research works in S06.

JSON: {"count": 31}

Why: count: expected 36, got 31

❌ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

(no answer found)

JSON: {"count": null}

Why: count: expected 36, got None

❌ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

33 research works in S06.

JSON: {"count": 33}

Why: count: expected 36, got 33

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

36 research works. These are the research-output works sourced from S06, including W17, W24, W229, W232, W233 and W1036. This is a manual scan.

JSON: {"count": 36}

❌ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

32. Research works whose source is S06 (hand-tallied, so treat as approximate).

JSON: {"count": 32}

Why: count: expected 36, got 32

❌ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

32. Research works with source S06, for example W17, W229, W233, W294, W435 and W1036.

JSON: {"count": 32}

Why: count: expected 36, got 32

❌ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

33 (hand tally).
The research works in S06 include W17, W24, W229, W232, W273, W294, W435, W445, W530, W613, W725, W793, W857, W1002, W1016 and others.

JSON: {"count": 33}

Why: count: expected 36, got 33

❌ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

35 research works in S06. Treat as approximate.

JSON: {"count": 35}

Why: count: expected 36, got 35