Q26, run 2026-11-06-0206-haiku

← back to the run

Does W23 count towards Kesting University's research output?

Tests: Retractions: a retracted work is not research output.

Expected: counts = no

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

No. W23 is flagged `is_retracted = true`, so it is excluded from output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

❌ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

Depends. W23 is type ART, so by type it is research output. It is marked retracted (is_retracted = true), and the data does not say whether retracted works are excluded.

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends

❌ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

Depends. W23 is an ART work by A09 (I07), but it is flagged is_retracted = true.

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends

❌ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

❌ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

(no answer found)

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends

❌ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

Yes. W23 is authored by A09 at I07 and is a research article. It is flagged as retracted but still counts.

JSON: {"counts": "yes"}

Why: counts: expected no, got yes

❌ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

Yes. W23 is an ART record; its retraction flag doesn't remove it from the research count, though a policy excluding retractions would change this.

JSON: {"counts": "yes"}

Why: counts: expected no, got yes

❌ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

Depends. W23 is an ART with I07 affiliation, so it counts by type. The data does not say whether retraction excludes it.

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends

❌ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

Depends. W23 is ART, so by type it counts toward Kesting, but it is flagged retracted, and the data doesn't say whether that excludes it.

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends

❌ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

Depends. W23 is ART by type, but it is flagged retracted and the data doesn't say whether retracted works count.

JSON: {"counts": "depends"}

Why: counts: expected no, got depends

❌ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

❌ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

❌ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is excluded.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

❌ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted and appeared in S02, so it is not research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so its research_output is "no".

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted and so is not research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted and has research_output no.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

No.
W23 is retracted, so it is not research output and does not count.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so research_output is no.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}