Q18, run 2026-11-06-0206-haiku

← back to the run

How many distinct research works has Priya Ramanathan (A07) authored?

Tests: Versions: W02 is the preprint of W03; also the erratum W05 is not a work of research.

Expected: count = 15

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

15. A07's ART records; W02 (PPR) and W05 (ERR) are excluded.

JSON: {"count": 15}

❌ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

17 research works: W01, W02, W03, W13, W72, W219, W251, W262, W292, W293, W435, W553, W598, W758, W787, W833, W969.

JSON: {"count": 17}

Why: count: expected 15, got 17

❌ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

17 research works. W219 is a preprint of W251, and both are A07 rows, so this would be 16 if the pair were merged.

JSON: {"count": 17}

Why: count: expected 15, got 17

❌ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

❌ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

(no answer found)

JSON: {"count": 17}

Why: count: expected 15, got 17

❌ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

18 for A07: W01, W02, W03, W13, W72, W219, W251, W262, W292, W293, W435, W553, W598, W758, W787, W833, W890, W969.

JSON: {"count": 18}

Why: count: expected 15, got 18

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

15 research works (A07; preprints W02 and W219 excluded).

JSON: {"count": 15}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

15 distinct research works. W02 and W03 are one work, as are W219 and W251, and W05 is an erratum.

JSON: {"count": 15}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

15. A07 has 17 research records; merging W02/W03 and W219/W251 leaves 15.

JSON: {"count": 15}

❌ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

17. Priya Ramanathan (A07) has 18 records, and W05 is an erratum.

JSON: {"count": 17}

Why: count: expected 15, got 17

❌ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

❌ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

15 research works, for Priya Ramanathan's ORCID (A07 only; A108 is a different ORCID).

JSON: {"count": 15}

❌ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

15. A07 only; A108 has a different ORCID. PPR W219 folds into W251.

JSON: {"count": 15}

❌ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

15. These are the distinct research works with A07 (ORCID …2298-3695). A108 has a different ORCID, so it is not counted.

JSON: {"count": 15}

❌ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

14 distinct research works by Priya Ramanathan (A07; W02 and W219 fold into W03 and W251).

JSON: {"count": 14}

Why: count: expected 15, got 14

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

15. A07 is the only record with ORCID 0000-0009-2298-3695. Preprint W02 merges into W03, preprint W219 merges into W251, and erratum W05 and the STG-free set are excluded.

JSON: {"count": 15}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

15 research works for Priya Ramanathan (A07). A108 has a different ORCID and is a different person.

JSON: {"count": 15}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

15 research works. These are the credits to person A07, the person kept separate from A108, and the list is W01, W03, W13, W72, W251, W262, W292, W293, W435, W553, W598, W758, W787, W833 and W969.

JSON: {"count": 15}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

15. Person A07 (not A108) is credited on 16 works, and W05 is not research output.

JSON: {"count": 15}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

15. A07 is credited on 15 research works (e.g. W01, W03, W13, W72, W251, W262, W969); W05 is excluded as non-research.

JSON: {"count": 15}

❌ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

14.
Priya Ramanathan (A07) is credited on W01, W03, W13, W72, W251, W262, W292, W293, W435, W598, W758, W787, W833 and W969, all research output.

JSON: {"count": 14}

Why: count: expected 15, got 14

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

15 research works for A07: W01, W03, W13, W72, W251, W262, W292, W293, W435, W553, W598, W758, W787, W833, W969.

JSON: {"count": 15}