Q14, run 2026-11-06-0206-haiku

← back to the run

How many research works did GB institutions publish in 2024, under full counting and under fractional counting (each work split equally among its authors, each author's share going to their institution's country)?

Tests: Counting method at country level.

Expected: full = 46 fractional = 42

❌ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

Full 44; fractional 41. Hand-tallied from GB-affiliated 2024 research records.

JSON: {"full": 44, "fractional": 41}

Why: full: expected 46, got 44; fractional: expected 42, got 41

❌ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

Not computed yet. The GB 2024 full and fractional counts are deferred to the next batch.

JSON: {"full": null, "fractional": null}

Why: full: expected 46, got None; fractional: expected 42, got None

❌ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

Full 47; fractional 43.5. Covers the Albury subtree (40 works) plus Dunmore College (I13) with 7 more, all 2024.

JSON: {"full": 47, "fractional": 43.5}

Why: full: expected 46, got 47; fractional: expected 42, got 43.5

❌ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

❌ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

(no answer found)

JSON: {"full": 45, "fractional": 41.5}

Why: full: expected 46, got 45; fractional: expected 42, got 41.5

❌ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

Not completed. This needs every 2024 GB-affiliated work, which I have not finished.

JSON: {"full": null, "fractional": null}

Why: full: expected 46, got None; fractional: expected 42, got None

❌ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

Full count 47; fractional count 43.5.

JSON: {"full": 47, "fractional": 43.5}

Why: full: expected 46, got 47; fractional: expected 42, got 43.5

❌ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

Not completed in this pass. This needs a row-by-row check of all 2024 GB-affiliated works.

JSON: {"full": null, "fractional": null}

Why: full: expected 46, got None; fractional: expected 42, got None

❌ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

Full 48; fractional 44. This is a manual tally of 2024 research works with at least one GB-institution author. It is the least verified of the counts.

JSON: {"full": 48, "fractional": 44}

Why: full: expected 46, got 48; fractional: expected 42, got 44

🟡 R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

Full 46, fractional 43.17. These are the 2024 research works with at least one GB-institution author, with each author's share of 1/N counted fractionally.

JSON: {"full": 46, "fractional": 43.17}

Why: fractional: expected 42, got 43.17

❌ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

❌ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

Full 46; fractional ≈42.3. These are 2024 research works with at least one GB-credited institution, each split by its author count.

JSON: {"full": 46, "fractional": 42.33}

❌ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

❌ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

Full 41*; fractional 38.33*. Counted over GB-country institutions for 2024.

JSON: {"full": 41, "fractional": 38.33}

Why: full: expected 46, got 41; fractional: expected 42, got 38.33

❌ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

❌ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

Not completed. This needs a full pass over GB-credited 2024 works and their author shares.

JSON: {"full": null, "fractional": null}

Why: full: expected 46, got None; fractional: expected 42, got None

❌ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

Not completed. This needs a full tally of 2024 GB-credited works, which I did not finish.

JSON: {"full": null, "fractional": null}

Why: full: expected 46, got None; fractional: expected 42, got None

❌ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

(no answer found)

JSON: {"full": null, "fractional": null}

Why: full: expected 46, got None; fractional: expected 42, got None

❌ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

Full 196 research works with a GB-credited institution. I did not complete the fractional count.

JSON: {"full": 196, "fractional": null}

Why: full: expected 46, got 196; fractional: expected 42, got None

❌ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

Not completed. Working this out needs the GB-affiliated authors on every 2024 research work, and I did not finish that tally reliably.

JSON: {"full": null, "fractional": null}

Why: full: expected 46, got None; fractional: expected 42, got None

❌ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

Full 44, fractional 40. These are 2024 research works with a credit to a GB institution (I02–I06, I13, I19–I21). Fractional is the share of each work's credits that are GB.

JSON: {"full": 44, "fractional": 40}

Why: full: expected 46, got 44; fractional: expected 42, got 40

❌ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

Not computed. A correct country-level 2024 count needs a full pass over every 2024 work's credits, and I have not produced figures I cannot verify.

JSON: {"full": null, "fractional": null}

Why: full: expected 46, got None; fractional: expected 42, got None

❌ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

Not computed (null).
This requires a full author-country pass over 2024 works that I did not complete.

JSON: {"full": null, "fractional": null}

Why: full: expected 46, got None; fractional: expected 42, got None

❌ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

Not tallied. Counting every 2024 research work with a GB-based credit (I01–I06, I13, I19–I21) needs a full scan that I did not complete.

JSON: {"full": null, "fractional": null}

Why: full: expected 46, got None; fractional: expected 42, got None