Q13, run 2026-11-06-0808-sonnet-query

← back to the run

In 2024, which had more research works, Kesting University (I07) or Rostval Technical University (I09): under full counting, and under fractional counting?

Tests: Counting method: the ranking flips.

Expected: full = I09 fractional = I07

✅ D1 sql run 1 graded by code · query session

Full: I09 (4 works against 3). Fractional: I07 (2.0 against 1.0).

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D1 sql run 2 graded by code · query session

Full: I09 (4 vs 3). Fractional: I07 (2.0 vs 1.0).

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D1 sql run 3 graded by code · query session

Full: I09 (4 works: W21, W27, W28, W29, against Kesting's 3). Fractional: I07 (2.0 against I09's 1.0).

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D1 sql run 4 graded by code · query session

Full counting: I09 (4 works against 3). Fractional counting: I07 (2.0 against 1.0).

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D1 sql run 5 graded by code · query session

Full: I09 (4 works against 3). Fractional: I07 (2.0 against 1.0).

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 1 graded by code · query session

Full: I09 (4 works against 3). Fractional: I07 (2.0 against 1.0). Rostval's 2024 works are W21, W27, W28 and W29, each a 0.25 share.

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 2 graded by code · query session

Full: I09 has 4 (W21, W27, W28, W29) against Kesting's 3. Fractional: I07 has 2.0 against I09's 1.0.

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 3 graded by code · query session

Full: I09, with 4 works (W21, W27, W28, W29) against 3 for Kesting. Fractional: I07, with 2.0 against 1.0 for Rostval.

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 4 graded by code · query session

Full: I09 (4 works against 3). Fractional: I07 (2.0 against 1.0). Rostval has W21, W27, W28 and W29 in 2024, each with four authors, so 0.25 each.

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D2 sql+markdown run 5 graded by code · query session

Full counting favours I09, which has 4 against I07's 3. Fractional counting favours I07, which has 2.0 against I09's 1.0.

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 1 graded by code · query session

Full counting: I09 (4 works against 3). Fractional counting: I07 (2.0 against 1.0).

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 2 graded by code · query session

Full: I09. Fractional: I07. Rostval has 4 works (W21, W27, W28, W29) against Kesting's 3, but only 4 × 0.25 = 1.0 against Kesting's 2.0.

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

🟡 D3 sql+executed run 3 graded by code · query session

Full counting is a tie, so there is no single answer. Both institutions have 4 works: Kesting has W20, W21, W22 and W24, and Rostval has W21, W27, W28 and W29. Under fractional counting Kesting leads, 3 to 1.

JSON: {"full": "tie", "fractional": "I07"}

Why: full: expected I09, got tie

✅ D3 sql+executed run 4 graded by code · query session

Full: I09, with 4 works (W21, W27, W28, W29) against Kesting's 3. Fractional: I07, with 2.0 against Rostval's 1.0 (a quarter of each of those four works).

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D3 sql+executed run 5 graded by code · query session

Full: I09, with 4 works (W21, W27, W28, W29) against 3 for I07. Fractional: I07, with 2.0 against 1.0 for I09.

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D4 sparql run 1 graded by code · query session

Full counting: I09 (4 works against 3). Fractional counting: I07 (2.0 against 1.0). Rostval has W21, W27, W28 and W29, each at 0.25.

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

❌ D4 sparql run 2 graded by code · query session

(no answer found)

Why: no structured answer

✅ D4 sparql run 3 graded by code · query session

Full counting: I09 has 4 (W21, W27, W28, W29) against I07's 3. Fractional counting: I07 has 2.0 against I09's 1.0.

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D4 sparql run 4 graded by code · query session

Full: I09, with 4 works (W21, W27, W28, W29) against 3 for I07. Fractional: I07, with 2.0 against 1.0 for I09.

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D4 sparql run 5 graded by code · query session

Full: I09 (4 works against 3). Fractional: I07 (2 against 1). I09's 2024 works are W21, W27, W28 and W29, at 0.25 each.

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 1 graded by code · query session

Full counting: I09 (4 works: W21, W27, W28, W29, against 3 for I07). Fractional counting: I07 (2.0 against 1.0 for I09).

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 2 graded by code · query session

Full: I09 (4 works against 3). Fractional: I07 (2.0 against 1.0). I09's works are W21, W27, W28 and W29, with 0.25 each.

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

❌ D5 sparql+ontology run 3 graded by code · query session

(no answer found)

JSON: {"full": null, "fractional": null}

Why: full: expected I09, got None; fractional: expected I07, got None

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 4 graded by code · query session

Full: I09, with 4 works (W21, W27, W28, W29) against 3 for I07. Fractional: I07 with 2.0 against I09 with 1.0.

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}

✅ D5 sparql+ontology run 5 graded by code · query session

Full: I09 (4 works against 3). Fractional: I07 (2.0 against 1.0).

JSON: {"full": "I09", "fractional": "I07"}