Q33, run 2026-11-05-1235-haiku

← back to the run

Which of Kesting University's research works has the most citations?

Tests: Local rule: STG records are test data; with them W22 would lead.

Expected: work = W20

❌ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92).

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

W22.
*Reasoning:* W22 has 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92), more than W20 (3) and W21 (2).

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92). The other Kesting research works have at most 3.

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92). Three of these are Kesting's own works, so excluding self-citations, W20 leads with 3 against W22's 1.

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92). The next Kesting work is W20 with 3.

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations. The other Kesting research works have 3 or fewer.

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92), versus W20's 3.

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92).

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92).

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

W20. It has three citations (from W32, W35 and W36), more than W21 (2) or W22 (1). W21, W22 and W24 are the other Kesting research works.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

W20. It has 3 citations (W32, W35, W36), against 2 for W21 and 1 for W22.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations. The others are W21 (2), W22 (1), and W08, W16, W24 (0).

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations (W32, W35, W36).

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations (W32, W35, W36).

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations (W32, W35, W36). W21 has 2 and W22 has 1.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

W20. It has 3 citations (W32, W35, W36), more than W21 (2) and W22 (1).

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations. W21 has 2, W22 has 1, and W08, W16 and W24 have none.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations (W32, W35, W36).

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

W20 has the most citations (3).

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations, against W21 (2) and W22 (1). W08, W16 and W24 have none.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations (W32, W35, W36).

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

❌ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92).

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92).

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

W22, cited by W34, W90, W91 and W92 (4 citations).

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92). Three of those come from Kesting's own works; W20 is the most-cited by external works (3).

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92). If Kesting's own works (W90–W92) are excluded, W20 leads with 3 to W22's 1.

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations (W32, W35, W36). Kesting's other research works have 2 (W21), 1 (W22) or 0.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

W20, with three citations (from W32, W35 and W36), the most of Kesting's research works.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

W20 (3 citations).

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

W20. It has three citations (W32, W35, W36), more than W21 (2), W22 (1), or the others (0).

JSON: {"work": "W20"}