Q26, run 2026-11-05-1235-haiku
Does W23 count towards Kesting University's research output?
Tests: Retractions: a retracted work is not research output.
Expected: counts = no
csv run 1
Depends. W23 is an ART record credited to I07 and so counts by type, but it is flagged is_retracted = true, and the data does not say whether retracted works are excluded.
JSON: {"counts": "depends"}
Why: counts: expected no, got depends
csv run 2
Depends.
*Reasoning:* W23 is ART and credited to I07 via A09, so it counts by type. However, it is flagged `is_retracted=true`, and the data gives no rule for whether retractions are excluded.
JSON: {"counts": "depends"}
Why: counts: expected no, got depends
csv run 3
Depends. W23 is typed ART and so is research by type, but it is flagged retracted, and the data does not say whether retractions are excluded.
JSON: {"counts": "depends"}
Why: counts: expected no, got depends
csv run 4
Yes. W23 is an ART by A09 at I07. The data has no rule excluding retracted works, so the is_retracted flag doesn't remove it, though some CRIS policies would.
JSON: {"counts": "yes"}
Why: counts: expected no, got yes
csv run 5
No. W23 is ART but flagged as retracted, and the data does not state a rule, so this assumes retracted works are excluded. Counting it would make the answer yes.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
rdf run 1
Yes. W23 is ART, so it counts under the document-type definition. The retracted flag is not part of that definition, though excluding retractions would change the answer.
JSON: {"counts": "yes"}
Why: counts: expected no, got yes
rdf run 2
Yes. W23 is an ART, and the data's retraction flag isn't stated to exclude it from output, so it counts.
JSON: {"counts": "yes"}
Why: counts: expected no, got yes
rdf run 3
Depends. W23 is an article by A09 at I07, so it counts by type, but it is flagged retracted and the data has no rule on retracted works.
JSON: {"counts": "depends"}
Why: counts: expected no, got depends
rdf run 4
Depends. W23 is an ART record, but the data does not say whether retracted works are excluded from research output. It is counted in Q11 and Q24; excluding it would give 8 and 3.
JSON: {"counts": "depends"}
Why: counts: expected no, got depends
rdf run 5
Yes. W23 is an article, and the retraction flag isn't a document type, so it counts in the data's type-based definition.
JSON: {"counts": "yes"}
Why: counts: expected no, got yes
rdf+ontology run 1
No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 2
No. W23 is retracted, so it is left out of every count of works.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 3
No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 4
No. W23 is retracted, so it is left out of every count.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
rdf+ontology run 5
No. W23 is retracted, so it is excluded from every count.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
csv+ontology run 1
No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
csv+ontology run 2
No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
csv+ontology run 3
No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
csv+ontology run 4
No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output and is excluded from Kesting's counts.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
csv+ontology run 5
No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
csv+markdown run 1
No. W23 is retracted, so it is excluded from research output.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
csv+markdown run 2
No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
csv+markdown run 3
No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
csv+markdown run 4
No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
csv+markdown run 5
No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
csv+padding run 1
Depends. W23 is typed ART and is not excluded by type, but it is flagged as retracted, and the data doesn't say whether retracted works count.
JSON: {"counts": "depends"}
Why: counts: expected no, got depends
csv+padding run 2
Yes. W23 is type ART and is credited to A09 at I07. Its retracted flag is not a type exclusion, so it is counted here.
JSON: {"counts": "yes"}
Why: counts: expected no, got yes
csv+padding run 3
Yes. W23 is ART, and its retraction flag is not a document-type exclusion, so it counts. If retractions were excluded, Kesting's Q11 count would fall to 8.
JSON: {"counts": "yes"}
Why: counts: expected no, got yes
csv+padding run 4
Depends. W23 is ART by type but flagged `is_retracted=true`, and the data doesn't say whether retracted works count.
JSON: {"counts": "depends"}
Why: counts: expected no, got depends
csv+padding run 5
Depends. W23 is an article and so counts by type, but it is marked is_retracted=true, and the data does not say whether retracted works are excluded.
JSON: {"counts": "depends"}
Why: counts: expected no, got depends
executed run 1
No. W23 has research_output "no" (it is retracted).
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
executed run 2
No. W23 is retracted, so research_output is "no".
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
executed run 3
No. W23 has research_output "no" because it is retracted.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
executed run 4
No. W23 has research_output "no" because it is retracted.
JSON: {"counts": "no"}
executed run 5
No. W23 is retracted and has research_output "no".
JSON: {"counts": "no"}