Q19, run 2026-11-05-1235-haiku

← back to the run

How many distinct works cite "Drift-aware mapping with low-cost sonar", in either of its versions?

Tests: Versions: citations to the preprint W02 and to W03 are citations of one work; W15 cites both and counts once.

Expected: count = 7

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

7. The distinct citing works are W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

7.
*Reasoning:* W02 is cited by W15 and W18; W03 is cited by W12, W13, W14, W15, W16 and W17. W15 is counted once.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

7. W02 and W03 are cited by W12, W13, W14, W15, W16 and W17 (both versions), and W18 cites W02.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

7. W02 and W03 are cited by W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

7. The citing works are W12, W13, W14, W16 and W17 (citing W03), plus W15 (citing both W02 and W03) and W18 (citing W02).

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

7. Citations to W03 come from W12, W13, W14, W16 and W17. Citations to W02 come from W15 and W18. The union is W12–W18 without W17… in full: W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17, W18.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

7. W12, W13, W14, W15, W16 and W17 cite W03, and W15 and W18 cite W02; W15 is counted once.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

7: W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18 cite W02 or W03.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

7. Citations to W02 (from W15, W18) and to W03 (from W12–W17) give distinct citing works W12–W18.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

7. W02 is a version of W03. Citing works are W12, W13, W14, W15, W16 and W17 (citing W03), plus W15 and W18 (citing W02), with W15 counted once.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

7. Citers of W02 are W15 and W18, and citers of W03 are W12, W13, W14, W15, W16 and W17. W15 cites both versions, so the distinct count is 7.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

7 distinct works: W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18. They cite W03, or W02 (its preprint), and W15 cites both.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

7. The citing works are W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18, counting W02 and W03 together.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

7. Citing works of W03 and its preprint W02 are W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

7: W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18 each cite W02 or W03.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

7. The citing works are W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18. W15 and W18 also cite the preprint W02, and W05 is an erratum rather than a version, so it is not counted.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

7. W02 is cited by W15 and W18. W03 is cited by W12, W13, W14, W15, W16 and W17.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

7. W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18 each cite W02 or W03, and no citing work is staging or retracted.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

7. W03 is cited by W12, W13, W14, W15, W16 and W17; its preprint W02 is cited by W15 and W18. W15 is counted once.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

7: W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18, which cite W03 or W02. W15 cites both and is counted once.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

7. The citing works are W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18, which cite W03 or its preprint W02.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

7. The citing works are W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 (citing W03) and W18 (citing W02). W15 cites both versions but is counted once.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

7. The citing works are W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18, which cite W03 and/or W02.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

7. W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18 cite W02 or W03. W15 cites both versions and is counted once.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

7. W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18 cite W03 or W02.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

7. The works citing W02 or W03 are W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18. W15 cites both versions, so it is counted once.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

7. The citing works are W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18; W15 cites both versions and is counted once.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

7. The works citing W02 or W03 are W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18. W15 cites both and is counted once.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

7. W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17, W18 cite W03 or W02.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

Seven: W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17, W18. These cite W03 or W02; W15 cites both and is counted once. The erratum W05 is not linked by version_of, so it is excluded.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

7. The citations to W03 (which absorbs W02) come from W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17, W18.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

7: W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18 cite W03, the published version of the drift-aware mapping paper.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

Seven: W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17, W18 cite W03, and all are research output.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

7. W12–W18 cite W03, and no citation links to W02 or W05.

JSON: {"count": 7}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

7. W12, W13, W14, W15, W16, W17 and W18 cite W03, the merged record for both versions.

JSON: {"count": 7}