Q26, run 2026-11-04-2053-sonnet

Does W23 count towards Kesting University's research output?

Tests: Retractions: a retracted work is not research output.

Expected: counts = no

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

No. W23 is flagged as retracted.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

❌ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

Yes. It is a retracted research article by I07, and the data has no rule removing retracted works. Its `is_retracted` flag is still available if you want to exclude it.

JSON: {"counts": "yes"}

Why: counts: expected no, got yes

❌ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

Yes. W23 is an ART with is_retracted = true. The flag doesn't change its type, so it still counts, though you may want to treat it separately.

JSON: {"counts": "yes"}

Why: counts: expected no, got yes

❌ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

Yes. W23 is an ART and still counts as output, although it is flagged retracted. The data does not say retracted works should be excluded.

JSON: {"counts": "yes"}

Why: counts: expected no, got yes

❌ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

Yes. W23 is retracted, but it is still an article by Kesting.

JSON: {"counts": "yes"}

Why: counts: expected no, got yes

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted and not research output, and it is the only Kesting work with that status.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted and so is not research output, even though it is credited to Kesting.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so it is not research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted and not research output.

JSON: {"counts": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

No. W23 is retracted, so research_output is "no".

JSON: {"counts": "no"}