Q40, run 2026-11-04-2010-sonnet

← back to the run

Which source is in the highest tier?

Tests: Local code: K3 is the highest tier, not K1.

Expected: source = S01

❌ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

S04, assuming K0 is the highest tier. The data doesn't define the order, so S01 (K3) is the alternative.

JSON: {"source": "S04"}

Why: source: expected S01, got S04

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

S01, assuming K3 is highest. If K0 is highest it would be S04.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

S01 (K3), assuming a higher number means a higher tier. The data does not define the tier ordering, so K0 could equally be the top.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

S01 (K3), under the same assumption that K3 is the highest tier.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

❌ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

Ambiguous for the same reason: S04 (K0) or S01 (K3).

JSON: {"source": null}

Why: source: expected S01, got None

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

S01 (K3), assuming a higher number means a higher tier. The data does not define the ordering, so S04 (K0) is the alternative.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

S01, but only if K3 is the highest tier. The data does not define the tier ordering.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

❌ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

Cannot be determined, for the same reason. S04 is K0 and S01 is K3.

JSON: {"source": null}

Why: source: expected S01, got None

✅ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

S01, which is the only K3 source. This again assumes K3 is the highest tier.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

S01. This rests on the same assumption that K3 is highest.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

S01 (K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

S01.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

S01.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

S01.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

S01 (K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

S01, which is K3.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

S01 (K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

S01.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

S01 (tier K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

S01 (K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

S01 (tier K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

S01 (K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

S01.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

S01 (K3).

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

S01.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

S01 (K3). If K0 is the top tier, it would be S04.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

S01, under the same assumption that K3 is highest.

JSON: {"source": "S01"}

❌ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

Cannot be settled. It is S01 if K3 is the top tier and S04 if K0 is.

JSON: {"source": null}

Why: source: expected S01, got None

❌ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

Cannot be determined, for the same reason as Q39.

JSON: {"source": null}

Why: source: expected S01, got None

❌ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

S04 (K0), on the assumption that lower numbers rank higher. The data doesn't define the tier order, so S01 (K3) is equally possible.

JSON: {"source": "S04"}

Why: source: expected S01, got S04