Q33, run 2026-11-04-2010-sonnet

← back to the run

Which of Kesting University's research works has the most citations?

Tests: Local rule: STG records are test data; with them W22 would lead.

Expected: work = W20

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

W20 (3 citations: W32, W35, W36).

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations. W22 would have 4 only if the staging citers W90–92 were counted.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations. W22 would have 4 only if the staging records W90–W92 counted.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations (W32, W35, W36).

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

❌ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92).

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92). This includes Kesting's own W90, W91 and W92.

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92).

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

❌ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

W22, with 4 citations (W34, W90, W91, W92).

JSON: {"work": "W22"}

Why: work: expected W20, got W22

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations (W32, W35, W36). Citations from the STG works W90–W92 are not counted.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations (W32, W35, W36).

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations (W32, W35, W36).

JSON: {"work": "W20"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

W20, with 3 citations (W32, W35, W36). The next is W21 with 2.

JSON: {"work": "W20"}