Q53, run 2026-11-04-2022-sonnet

← back to the run

Are Belir Mining SA and Rotam Group Inc in the same group?

Tests: Sources: the stale parent from RESEARCH is overruled by the RATINGS record.

Expected: same_group = no

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

No. E5062 sits under Belir Group, and only the RESEARCH duplicate E5168 names Rotam (E5086) as parent.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

No. E5062 sits under E5059 (Belir). Only the RESEARCH duplicate E5168 points to E5086.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

❌ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

Depends. E5062's RATINGS parent is E5060 (Belir), but its duplicate E5168 names E5086 (Rotam) as parent.

JSON: {"same_group": "depends"}

Why: same_group: expected no, got depends

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

No. The RATINGS record E5062 sits under Belir (E5060 → E5059). The RESEARCH record E5168 claims parent E5086, but it conflicts with the RATINGS record, so I did not rely on it.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

No. E5062's parents run to E5059. E5168 is a RESEARCH duplicate of E5062 that wrongly points to E5086.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

No. RATINGS holds parent links, so Belir Mining E5062 sits under E5060 and E5059, not under Rotam; the E5168 research link is ignored.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

No. RATINGS holds the parent link, and E5062's chain ends at E5059, not E5086. The RESEARCH record E5168 is not authoritative.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

No. The link from E5168 to E5086 is on a RESEARCH record, but RATINGS holds the parent links and puts Belir Mining under E5060.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

No. RATINGS holds parent links, and it puts E5062 under E5060 and E5059, not Rotam; the E5168 link to E5086 is ignored.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

No. E5062's RATINGS parent chain ends at E5059 (Belir Group).

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

No. E5062's top is E5059, while Rotam's top is E5086.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

No. Belir Mining's top is E5059 and Rotam's is E5086.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

No. E5062 belongs to the E5059 group and E5086 is the top of the Rotam group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

No. E5062 sits in the E5059 group and Rotam Group Inc is E5086, a separate group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

No. Their ultimate parents are E5059 and E5086.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 1 graded by code

No. The RATINGS parent of E5062 is E5060, in the Belir group. The RESEARCH record E5168 shows E5086, but RATINGS takes precedence.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 2 graded by code

No. E5062's RATINGS record puts it under Belir Group (E5059); the parent shown on the RESEARCH record E5168 is not used.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 3 graded by code

No. Per the RATINGS records Belir Mining (E5062) sits under E5060 in the Belir group, and only a research duplicate (E5168) claims E5086 as parent.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 4 graded by code

No. The RATINGS record for Belir Mining (E5062) places it under Belir (E5060/E5059). The research duplicate E5168 names E5086 as parent, and the rules ignore it.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 5 graded by code

No. The rules use the RATINGS parent (E5060, the Belir chain), not the research record's parent E5086.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}