Q40, run 2026-11-04-2022-sonnet

← back to the run

How many distinct issuers domiciled in GB held an issuer rating on 1 October 2026?

Tests: Identity and withdrawal: Northwind counted once, Pellam not at all, the QA record ignored.

Expected: count = 79

❌ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

87, counted manually by GB domicile among the rated issuers.

JSON: {"count": 87}

Why: count: expected 79, got 87

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

79, from my manual tally, so treat it as approximate.

JSON: {"count": 79}

❌ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

86. This counts GB-domiciled rated issuers (deduplicated, with withdrawals excluded) and includes the QA entities.

JSON: {"count": 86}

Why: count: expected 79, got 86

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

79. These are the distinct GB-domiciled entities holding an issuer rating on 2026-10-01.

JSON: {"count": 79}

❌ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

I can't give a reliable count. It needs the same per-entity pass as Q9, so the JSON has null.

JSON: {"count": null}

Why: count: expected 79, got None

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

79 GB-domiciled issuers hold an issuer rating, counting by LEI and applying the RESEARCH country; E10 is therefore not GB.

JSON: {"count": 79}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

79 GB-domiciled issuers. No duplicate record changes a GB entity's domicile.

JSON: {"count": 79}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

79. These are GB-domiciled entities with an LTIDR in force on 2026-10-01, and no GB record has a RESEARCH override.

JSON: {"count": 79}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

79. These are GB-domiciled entities (after RESEARCH country corrections) with an issuer rating in force on 2026-10-01.

JSON: {"count": 79}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

79. These are GB-domiciled entities with an issuer rating still in force on 1 Oct 2026, counting each LEI once.

JSON: {"count": 79}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

79. This counts GB-domiciled entities with an open, non-withdrawn issuer rating.

JSON: {"count": 79}

❌ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

78 GB-domiciled entities have an issuer rating in force.

JSON: {"count": 78}

Why: count: expected 79, got 78

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

79. This counts GB-domiciled entities with an open, non-WD issuer rating.

JSON: {"count": 79}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

79. These are GB-domiciled entities with a non-withdrawn LTIDR in force on 2026-10-01.

JSON: {"count": 79}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

79 GB-domiciled entities with an issuer rating in force.

JSON: {"count": 79}

❌ R8 csv+axioms run 1 graded by code

About 80. This is an estimate only (low confidence); I did not tally every GB issuer.

JSON: {"count": 80}

Why: count: expected 79, got 80

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 2 graded by code

79. This is a manual count of GB-domiciled entities with an issuer rating in force.

JSON: {"count": 79}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 3 graded by code

79 distinct GB-domiciled issuers (manual tally).

JSON: {"count": 79}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 4 graded by code

79 distinct GB-domiciled issuers hold an issuer rating, counted by hand from the entity list.

JSON: {"count": 79}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 5 graded by code

79. This counts GB-domiciled entities with an issuer rating in force.

JSON: {"count": 79}