Q27, run 2026-11-04-2022-sonnet

← back to the run

How is Corvenia Power's 2032 note rated?

Tests: Instrument versus issuer: the subordinated note sits below the issuer.

Expected: rating = A-

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

A- (A42, on I06).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

A- (A42). The 2032 note is I06.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

A- (A42, instrument I06).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

A-. The 2032 note is I06 (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

A-. I06 has its own rating of A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

A-. I06 was assigned A- by A42, which is within Corvenia's ceiling of A.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

A- (I06, A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

A-. I06 has a single INST action (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

A-. I06 was assigned A- in A42.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

A-. I06 carries an instrument rating of A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

A- (I06, A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

A- (A42 on I06).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

A-. I06 is rated A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

A-. The 2032 note is I06 (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 1 graded by code

A- (A42).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 2 graded by code

A- (A42, I06).

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 3 graded by code

A-, from A42.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 4 graded by code

A-, from A42 on I06.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 5 graded by code

A-, from A42.

JSON: {"rating": "A-"}