Q46, run 2026-11-05-2135-sonnet

← back to the run

Does Halden Leasing have an issuer rating?

Tests: Local type: a credit opinion (CO) is not a rating.

Expected: issuer_rating = no

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO (counterparty) rating, A46, and no LTIDR.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO rating (A46, BBB) and no LTIDR.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO rating (A46) and no LTIDR or STIDR; the data does not define CO.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO record (A46) and no LTIDR. Its notes are rated through the guarantor.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO). Its notes (I05) are rated through the guarantee.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a counterparty-type (CO) rating, A46, not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a counterparty-type rating (BBB, A46), not a long-term IDR.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO-type rating (A46, BBB) and no long-term IDR. The data does not define CO, so I read it as not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO-type rating (A46), not a long-term issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO-type rating (A46, BBB), no long-term issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a Credit Opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has no issuer-rating actions, and A46 is a credit opinion, which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. E11 is a finance subsidiary with no issuer-rating actions.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. E11 is a finance subsidiary with no issuer rating; its only action is a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a Credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

No. E11 is a finance subsidiary with only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. E11 is a finance subsidiary with only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. E11 is a finance subsidiary with only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

No. E11 is a finance subsidiary with only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating, and its debt is guaranteed by E10.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

No. E11 is a finance subsidiary with only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

No. E11 is a finance subsidiary with only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

No. E11 is a finance subsidiary with only a credit opinion (A46), which isn't an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

No. E11 only has a CO rating (A46).

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO-type rating (A46) and no LTIDR.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO rating (A46), not an issuer default rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO-type rating (A46, BBB), not a long-term issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

No. E11 only has a "CO" record (A46), which is not an issuer rating (LTIDR). It does have a guaranteed note, I05.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has no ratings of its own. Its note I05 is rated through the guarantor E10.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has no rating records of its own; I05 is rated on E10's credit.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has no rating record of its own. I05 is rated on the guarantor E10's credit.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has no rating rows. Only the guaranteed note I05 is linked to E10's rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has no rating records of its own; I05 is rated through the E10 guarantee.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 1 graded by code

No. E11 is a finance subsidiary with only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 2 graded by code

No. E11 is a finance subsidiary with no issuer-rating actions; its only action is a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 3 graded by code

No. E11 is a finance subsidiary and only has a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 4 graded by code

No. E11 is a finance subsidiary with only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a Credit Opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO).

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 2 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 4 graded by code

No. E11 only has a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 5 graded by code

No. E11 only has a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 2 graded by code

No. E11 only has a Credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}