Q34, run 2026-11-05-2135-sonnet

← back to the run

Is Halden Foods part of the same group as Halden Bank?

Tests: Groups: a shared name is not a shared group.

Expected: same_group = no

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent and no link to E09/E10; only the name is similar.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent and no link to E09, E10 or E11.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent and no link to E09 in the data; only the name is similar.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent and no link to E09, so only the name is shared.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link, and only the name suggests a connection. E10 sits under E09.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link to E09, E10 or E11.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10, and the shared name doesn't establish a group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

❌ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

Depends. E12 has no parent or ownership link in the data, and only the shared name "Halden" suggests a connection.

JSON: {"same_group": "depends"}

Why: same_group: expected no, got depends

✅ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link to E09, E10 or E11; the shared name is not evidence of a group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link to E09/E10, and the data shows only a name similarity.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link, while E10 sits under E09.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link to E09 and is not the same entity as E10, so it is not in the group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link, so it is not in the group of E09, E10 and E11.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link and shares nothing but a name prefix with E09's group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent, while E10 sits in the E09 group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent, while E10 sits under E09.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent, so it is outside E09's group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent, while E10 belongs to E09's group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link, so it is not in E09's group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent, so it is not in the E09 group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent, while E10 belongs to the E09 group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent, so it is outside the E09 group that contains E10.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent and sits outside E09's group, which contains E10.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent and is not in E09's group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent, while E10 sits under E09.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent_id and no link to E09 or E10, so the data shows only a shared name.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link, and sharing a name is not evidence of a group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent, while E10 sits under E09. The shared "Halden" name does not link them.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link, so the data shows it outside the E09 group. Only the shared "Halden" name suggests a connection.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent and appears in no ancestor chain, while E10 sits under E09.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent and sits outside the E09 chain.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent, and E09's group contains only E09, E10 and E11.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent and is not in E09's chain, whereas E10 is a subsidiary of E09.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent and no link to E09, so the shared name does not make it part of the group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 1 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent, while E10 sits under E09.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 2 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link to E09, so it is not in that group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 3 graded by code

No. Halden Foods E12 has no parent, while Halden Bank sits under E09.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 4 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link, so nothing ties it to E09's group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 5 graded by code

Yes for Halden Bank. No for Halden Foods, which is not in the group: E12 has no parent, while Halden Bank (E10) is a subsidiary of E09. So Halden Foods and Halden Bank are not in the same group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 1 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent and E10's parent is E09, so they only share a name prefix.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 2 graded by code

No. Halden Foods (E12) has no parent. Halden Bank sits under E09, so the shared name alone does not make them one group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 3 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link and a different LEI from the group, so the shared name alone does not make it part of the group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 4 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link in the data and only shares the "Halden" name, so the data does not support a link.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 5 graded by code

No, as far as the data shows. E12 has no parent and no shared LEI with the Halden entities; only the name is similar.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 1 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent and no link to E09.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 2 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent, while E10 belongs to E09's group.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 3 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link, while E10's parent chain ends at E09.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 4 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link to E09 or E10.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 5 graded by code

No. E12 has no parent link to E09.

JSON: {"same_group": "no"}