Q46, run 2026-11-05-2135-haiku

← back to the run

Does Halden Leasing have an issuer rating?

Tests: Local type: a credit opinion (CO) is not a rating.

Expected: issuer_rating = no

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

No
E11's only rating record is a CO action (A46), not an LTIDR.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a CO-type rating (A46), not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

No. E11's only rating is a CO-type BBB (A46). CO is not the LTIDR issuer-rating type.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a CO action (A46). The data does not define CO, so it is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has no LTIDR. Its only record is a CO-type rating (A46), and CO is not defined in the data.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

❌ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

Depends. E11 has a BBB rating (A46) of type CO, which the data does not define.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "depends"}

Why: issuer_rating: expected no, got depends

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

No LTIDR issuer rating. Halden Leasing (E11) has only an A46 record of type CO (BBB), whose meaning the data does not define.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

❌ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

Depends. Halden Leasing (E11) has a BBB rating (A46), but it is a CO-type record and the data does not define whether CO counts as an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "depends"}

Why: issuer_rating: expected no, got depends

❌ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

Depends. Halden Leasing (E11) has a BBB rating (A46), but its ratingType is CO, which is undefined in the data, not an explicit LTIDR.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "depends"}

Why: issuer_rating: expected no, got depends

❌ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

Yes. E11 has an entity-level rating, BBB (A46, type CO).

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "yes"}

Why: issuer_rating: expected no, got yes

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

No.
E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, type CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) only has a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, type CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. E11's only entry is A46, a credit opinion (CO), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

No
E11's only action is a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a Credit Opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

No
E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is never an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a Credit Opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

No. E11's only record is a Credit Opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

No. A46 is a credit opinion (CO), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

No. The only record is a CO-type rating (A46), not an LTIDR issuer rating, and CO is undefined.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO rating (A46), not an LTIDR. CO is undefined, so this is an assumption.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

❌ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

Depends. Halden Leasing (E11) has a CO-type rating of BBB (A46) but no LTIDR, and the data does not define CO.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "depends"}

Why: issuer_rating: expected no, got depends

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO record (A46, BBB), not an LTIDR issuer rating, and CO is not defined.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing has only a CO-type rating (A46, BBB). CO is not an issuer rating type in the data.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has no rating records.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has no LTIDR rating record.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has no rows in ratings.csv; its note I05 is rated on E10's credit.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has no LTIDR rating records.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has no LTIDR record in ratings.csv.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 2 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a Credit Opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a Credit Opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 4 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 5 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a credit opinion (A46), and credit opinions are not issuer ratings.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 1 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) only has a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 2 graded by code

No.
E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which the ontology says is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 4 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 5 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}