Q4, run 2026-11-05-2135-haiku

← back to the run

What is Northwind Holdings' current outlook?

Tests: Identity: two records with the same LEI are one entity, whatever their names.

Expected: outlook = positive

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

POS
E02's only outlook is STA (A08), but E03 (same LEI 213800PHEIYNJMHTDV74) has the later affirmation A09 (2025-09-15) at POS. I treated E03 as the same entity.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

Positive. E02's only action is Stable (A08, 2023), but E03 is the same LEI (213800PHEIYNJMHTDV74) under RESEARCH and carries Positive from A09 (2025-09-15), which is the latest action on this legal entity.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

Positive (POS). E03 has the same LEI as E02, and its latest action (A09, 2025-09-15) is an affirmation at A with POS outlook; E02's own record shows STA from 2023, so this depends on accepting the RESEARCH duplicate.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

Positive, but the data conflicts. E03 (same LEI as E02) has the latest action, an affirmation with POS outlook (A09, 2025-09-15). E02's last action (A08, 2023) shows STA.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

❌ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

Stable (STA). E02 has been A/STA since A08. E03, the same LEI from the RESEARCH source, shows Positive (A09), which conflicts with E02.

JSON: {"outlook": "STA"}

Why: outlook: expected positive, got STA

❌ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

Stable. Northwind Holdings (E02) has one action, A08 (AS A, STA).

JSON: {"outlook": "Stable"}

Why: outlook: expected positive, got Stable

❌ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

Stable. E02's only rating, A08 (A, 2023-11-01), carries outlook STA.

JSON: {"outlook": "STA"}

Why: outlook: expected positive, got STA

❌ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

Stable (STA). Northwind Holdings (E02) has a single action, an A assignment with STA outlook (A08).

JSON: {"outlook": "STA"}

Why: outlook: expected positive, got STA

❌ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

STA (stable). Northwind Holdings (E02) has a single record, A08 (A, STA, 2023-11-01).

JSON: {"outlook": "STA"}

Why: outlook: expected positive, got STA

❌ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

STA (stable). E02 A08 is its only outlook record.

JSON: {"outlook": "STA"}

Why: outlook: expected positive, got STA

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

Positive.
E02 and E03 share LEI 213800PHEIYNJMHTDV74, so they are one entity; the latest outlook is set by A09 (Affirmed A, outlook POS, 2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

Positive. E02 (Northwind Holdings) and E03 share an LEI, and the latest outlook is POS in A09 (2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

Positive. E02 and E03 share LEI 213800PHEIYNJMHTDV74, so they are one entity. Its latest outlook is in A09 (AF A, POS, 2025-09-15), which supersedes A08 (STA, 2023).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

Positive. A09 (AF A, POS, 2025-09-15) is the latest outlook on E02/E03.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

Positive
E02 has no outlook-bearing action after A08, but its LEI-identical record E03 has A09 (AF A, POS, 2025-09-15), which is the latest outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

POS (Positive). E02 and E03 are the same entity (same LEI), and A09 (2025-09-15, AF, POS) is the latest outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

Positive. A09 (2025-09-15, AF A, POS) is recorded on E03, the RESEARCH record of E02, and is the latest outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

(no answer found)

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

Positive. E02 and E03 share an LEI, so A09 (E03, AF, A, POS, 2025-09-15) is the latest action on this entity.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

Positive. E02 and E03 share an LEI, so the latest action is A09 (AF, A, POS, 2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

POS. E02's latest action is A09 (2025-09-15, E03 record, same LEI), which affirmed A with a positive outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

Positive (POS). E03 is the same LEI as E02, and its latest action is A09 (2025-09-15), an affirmation at A with a POS outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

Positive (POS). A09 (2025-09-15, affirmed at A, POS) is the latest action on the Northwind Holdings records E02/E03, which share one LEI. (E02, E03)

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

POS. The latest Northwind Holdings action is A09 (2025-09-15, affirmed A, outlook POS), recorded under E03, which shares E02's LEI.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

Positive. Northwind Holdings (E02) and its duplicate record E03 share LEI 213800PHEIYNJMHTDV74, and the latest action (A09, 15 Sep 2025) set the outlook to POS.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

❌ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

Stable, per E02 (A08). E03 is the same LEI and shows Positive from A09 (2025-09-15), so the data conflicts here.

JSON: {"outlook": "STA"}

Why: outlook: expected positive, got STA

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

Positive. E02 was STA (A08), but E03 (same LEI) was affirmed at A with POS on 2025-09-15 (A09), which is the later action.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

❌ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

Stable. Northwind Holdings (E02) has no outlook change after A08 (STA). The duplicate research record E03 shows POS (A09), so the sources conflict.

JSON: {"outlook": "STA"}

Why: outlook: expected positive, got STA

❌ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

STA. E02's latest action, A08, carries STA. However, E03 (a RESEARCH record with the same LEI) shows POS in A09 (2025-09-15), and the data does not reconcile the two.

JSON: {"outlook": "STA"}

Why: outlook: expected positive, got STA

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

POS, but the records conflict. E03 (RESEARCH source) shows Positive on 2025-09-15 (A09), while E02 (RATINGS source) shows Stable from 2023-11-01 (A08). The data does not say which record is authoritative.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

Positive. E02's current LTIDR FC A carries outlook POS (from 2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

Positive. E02's A rating carries a POS outlook from 2025-09-15 (A09), still open.

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

Positive. E02's A rating has outlook POS from 2025-09-15 (A09).

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

Positive. E02's A rating carries a POS outlook from 2025-09-15 (A09, still open).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

Positive. Northwind Holdings (E02) has a current LTIDR FC rating of A with outlook POS (A09).

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 1 graded by code

Positive. E02 and E03 share an LEI, and the latest action is A09 (AF, A, POS, 2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 2 graded by code

Positive. Northwind Holdings' latest action is the 2025-09-15 affirmation with a Positive outlook (A09, on E03, which shares LEI with E02).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 3 graded by code

Positive (POS). The latest action on E02/E03 is A09 (affirmed A, POS, 2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 4 graded by code

Positive. The latest action on E02/E03 (same LEI) is the affirmation A09 (2025-09-15) with outlook POS.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 5 graded by code

POS (Positive). E02's latest action is A09 (affirmed A, outlook POS, 2025-09-15), recorded against its RESEARCH duplicate E03, which is the same LEI.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 1 graded by code

Positive (E02/E03). A09 (affirmed A, POS, 2025-09-15, on the RESEARCH record E03, same LEI) is the latest action and supersedes A08.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 2 graded by code

Positive. Northwind Holdings' current record is E03, which shares LEI with E02, and its latest action A09 (2025-09-15) carries outlook POS.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 3 graded by code

Positive. E03 (same LEI as E02) has A09 (affirmed A, Positive, 2025-09-15), which supersedes A08 (Stable).

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 4 graded by code

Positive. E02's A08 (STA) was superseded by A09 (AF, A, POS, 2025-09-15), which is recorded on E03, the same LEI.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 5 graded by code

Positive. E02's latest LTIDR action is the affirmation at A on 2025-09-15 with outlook POS (A09, recorded under the research alias E03).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 1 graded by code

Positive. The latest action is the affirmation at A with POS outlook on 2025-09-15 (A09), recorded on E03, which is the same entity as E02 (same LEI).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 2 graded by code

Positive.
E02 and its duplicate E03 are the same LEI, so the latest action (A09, 2025-09-15, AF, outlook POS) governs.

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 3 graded by code

Positive (POS). E02 and E03 share an LEI, so they are one entity; the latest LTIDR action is A09 (2025-09-15), an affirmation at A with a positive outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 4 graded by code

Positive. Northwind Holdings is E02, and E03 is the same entity (same LEI). Its latest outlook is POS from A09 (2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 5 graded by code

Positive. Northwind Holdings is E02 (E03 is the same LEI), and the latest action is A09 (affirmed A, outlook POS, 2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}