Q31, run 2026-11-05-2135-haiku

← back to the run

Did any company have a foreign-currency issuer rating above its country's ceiling on 1 October 2026?

Tests: Ceilings: the sovereign's own rating can be below its ceiling, and a local-currency rating above it.

Expected: any = no

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

No
No VD entity has an FC rating above BB, and no CV entity has one above A.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

No. No FC rating in VD is above BB or in CV above A.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

No. No Valdoria or Corvenia FC issuer rating is above its ceiling. The data has no ceilings for other countries, so those cannot be checked.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

No. None of the VD or CV entities I checked has an FC rating above its ceiling.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

No. No VD entity's FC rating exceeds BB, and no CV entity's FC rating exceeds A.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

No. None of the foreign-currency ratings exceed their country ceilings.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

No. No FC rating in VD or CV exceeds its ceiling on 1 Oct 2026.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

No. None of the foreign-currency ratings for entities in VD or CV exceed their ceiling. Ceilings exist only for VD and CV in the data.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

No. No FC issuer rating exceeds its country ceiling as of 1 Oct 2026.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

No, under the same assumption. No foreign-currency rating sits above VD's BB or CV's A.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

No.
No domiciled entity has an FC issuer rating above its country's ceiling on 2026-10-01.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. No FC issuer rating on 1 Oct 2026 is above its country's ceiling.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. No company's FC rating in the data is above BB for VD-domiciled entities or above A for CV-domiciled entities.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. No FC issuer rating is above its ceiling as of 1 Oct 2026.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

No
No FC issuer rating sits above its country's ceiling on 1 Oct 2026.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

No. No VD or CV entity has an FC rating above its ceiling on 2026-10-01.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. No domiciled entity's FC issuer rating is above its ceiling on 1 Oct 2026; several are at the cap, and none exceed it.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

No
No VD-domiciled FC rating is above BB, and no CV-domiciled FC rating is above A.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. Every FC rating in VD and CV domiciles is at or below its ceiling.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

No. No VD-domiciled FC rating is above BB, and no CV-domiciled FC rating is above A.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

No. No VD entity's FC rating exceeds BB, and no CV entity's exceeds A.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

No. No company's FC rating is above its country's ceiling on 1 Oct 2026.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

No. No VD-domiciled FC rating exceeds BB, and no CV-domiciled FC rating exceeds A.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

No. No company's FC rating sits above its domicile's ceiling on 1 Oct 2026.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

No. No FC issuer rating on 1 Oct 2026 is above its country's ceiling; the highest sit exactly at the ceiling (see Q30).

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

No. I found no FC issuer rating above either country ceiling.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

No. No Valdoria or Corvenia entity has a foreign-currency rating above its ceiling.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

No. Only the Valdoria (BB) and Corvenia (A) ceilings exist in the data, and none of the entities I checked exceeds its ceiling. The check on Corvenia entities was not exhaustive.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

No. Where ceilings are known, no FC rating is above them. The data has no ceilings for other countries.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

No. No foreign-currency issuer rating is above its country's ceiling. The highest Valdoria entities are BB, and the highest Corvenia entities are A.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

No. No CV-domiciled entity has an FC rating above A, and no VD-domiciled entity has one above BB.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

No. No FC issuer rating on 1 Oct 2026 sits above its country ceiling (CV: A; VD: BB).

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

No. No CV- or VD-domiciled entity has an FC rating above its ceiling.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

No. No FC issuer rating exceeds its country ceiling on 1 Oct 2026.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

No. No VD company has an FC rating above BB, and no CV company has one above A.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 1 graded by code

No. No FC issuer rating is above its country's ceiling on 2026-10-01.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 2 graded by code

No. The highest FC issuer ratings for VD and CV entities equal their ceilings and do not exceed them (ceilings from A12 and A37).

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 3 graded by code

No. No FC issuer rating is above BB for VD or above A for CV.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 4 graded by code

No. No VD-domiciled FC rating exceeds BB, and no CV-domiciled one exceeds A.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 5 graded by code

No. The VD ceiling is BB and the CV ceiling is A, and no FC issuer rating sits above either.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 1 graded by code

No. Every FC issuer rating in VD or CV sits at or below its ceiling.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 2 graded by code

No. No FC issuer rating in VD or CV sits above its ceiling (BB and A respectively).

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 3 graded by code

No. The highest FC rating domiciled in VD is BB, which equals the ceiling and is not above it.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 4 graded by code

No. No FC rating I checked is above its country ceiling; the cases at ceiling are listed in Q30.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 5 graded by code

No. No FC issuer rating is above its country ceiling on 2026-10-01.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 1 graded by code

No. None of the FC ratings I checked is above its country ceiling.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 2 graded by code

No.
No VD or CV entity's FC issuer rating is above its ceiling; the highest is E15, E1039 and E1194 at A.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 3 graded by code

No. No VD-domiciled entity has an FC rating above BB, and no CV-domiciled entity has one above A, on 1 Oct 2026.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 4 graded by code

No. No domiciled entity's latest FC issuer rating is above its ceiling.

JSON: {"any": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 5 graded by code

No. The VD ceiling is BB and the CV ceiling is A, and no company domiciled in either country has a higher FC rating on 1 Oct 2026.

JSON: {"any": "no"}