Q42, run 2026-11-04-1738-sonnet

← back to the run

In which country is Halden Bank domiciled?

Tests: Local rule: where records disagree, the RATINGS record holds.

Expected: country = DE

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

DE (E10, from the RATINGS source). The duplicate record E17 says LU, which conflicts.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

DE per E10 (RATINGS), but the RESEARCH duplicate E17 says LU, so the sources conflict.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 says DE; the RESEARCH duplicate E17 says LU.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

DE (E10). The research duplicate E17 says LU.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

DE. E10 (RATINGS) says DE, while the duplicate E17 (RESEARCH) says LU. I preferred the RATINGS record.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record (E10) takes precedence over the RESEARCH record (E17, LU).

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

DE. RATINGS record E10 says DE, and it overrides the RESEARCH record E17 (LU).

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 says DE and takes precedence over the research record E17 (LU).

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 holds, and the RESEARCH record E17 saying LU is overridden.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

DE. The RATINGS record E10 holds, and the LU on the RESEARCH record E17 is overridden.

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

DE (E10).

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

DE (E10).

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

DE (E10).

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

DE (E10).

JSON: {"country": "DE"}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

DE (E10).

JSON: {"country": "DE"}