Q4, run 2026-11-05-1233-haiku

← back to the run

What is Northwind Holdings' current outlook?

Tests: Identity: two records with the same LEI are one entity, whatever their names.

Expected: outlook = positive

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

Positive (POS). E03 has the same LEI as E02 and carries the only later outlook (POS, A09), but E02's own record (A08) shows STA. This assumes E03 and E02 are the same entity.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

Positive (POS). E03 ("NORTHWIND HLDGS") shares E02's LEI and has the latest outlook, POS (A09, 2025-09-15), while E02's last outlook was STA (A08, 2023). The data doesn't settle whether the two records should be merged, so treat this as provisional.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

Positive, but this depends on treating E02 and E03 as one entity. They share LEI 213800PHEIYNJMHTDV74, and E03's 2025-09-15 affirmation (A09) carries POS, while E02's own record (A08) shows STA.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

Positive (POS). The latest action is A09 (2025-09-15) on E03, which has the same LEI as E02 and carries POS. E02's own record is STA from 2023 (A08), so the two records conflict.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

❌ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

Unresolved. E02 (RATINGS) shows Stable (A08, 2023-11-01), but E03 (RESEARCH, same LEI) shows Positive (A09, 2025-09-15). The data doesn't say which applies.

JSON: {"outlook": "unresolved: STA or POS"}

Why: outlook: expected positive, got unresolved: STA or POS

❌ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

Stable (STA). E02's only rating action is A08, which carries a stable outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "STA"}

Why: outlook: expected positive, got STA

❌ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

Stable (STA), per A08 (E02, 2023-11-01). E03 shares E02's LEI and has a Positive outlook (A09), so the data conflicts here.

JSON: {"outlook": "STA"}

Why: outlook: expected positive, got STA

❌ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

STA (stable)
Northwind Holdings (E02) has one rating action, A08, which carries a stable outlook, and no later outlook change is recorded.

JSON: {"outlook": "STA"}

Why: outlook: expected positive, got STA

❌ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

STA (stable). A08 is the only Northwind Holdings (E02) action with an outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "STA"}

Why: outlook: expected positive, got STA

❌ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

Ambiguous. E02 (A08) shows Stable, but E03 (A09, later) shows Positive; both carry the same LEI (213800PHEIYNJMHTDV74), and the data doesn't say which record governs.

JSON: {"outlook": "ambiguous (STA per E02; POS per E03)"}

Why: outlook: expected positive, got ambiguous (STA per E02; POS per E03)

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

Positive (POS). The latest outlook on E02/E03's LTIDR is set by A09 (2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

POS
A09 (E03, same LEI as E02) affirmed the A rating on 2025-09-15 with a Positive outlook, and no later outlook is recorded.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

Positive (POS). A09 (2025-09-15) is E02's latest outlook action; its record E03 is the same LEI as E02.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

**Positive (POS).** Northwind Holdings is E02, and E03 is the same LEI, so A09 (2025-09-15) applies.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

Positive (POS)
The latest action on Northwind Holdings is A09 (AF, 2025-09-15, outlook POS), recorded on E03, which shares E02's LEI and so is the same entity.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

Positive (POS). The latest outlook on E02 (also recorded as E03) is from A09 (2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

Positive (POS). The latest LTIDR action for Northwind Holdings is A09 (2025-09-15) on E03, which is the same LEI as E02.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

Positive (POS). The latest outlook on Northwind Holdings is set by A09 (E03, same LEI as E02).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

Positive (POS). The latest action on Northwind Holdings is A09 (E03, same LEI as E02), which set the outlook to POS.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

Positive (POS). The latest Northwind Holdings action is A09 (2025-09-15, recorded against E03, the same LEI as E02).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

POS. The latest Northwind Holdings action is A09 (E03, the same LEI as E02), which set the outlook to Positive.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

Positive. Northwind Holdings (E02, with E03 as the same entity) was affirmed at A with a Positive outlook on 2025-09-15 (A09).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

Positive. E02 and E03 are the same entity (same LEI), and the latest action is A09 (2025-09-15, outlook POS).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

Positive. E03 is the same LEI as E02, so A09 (AF, POS, 2025-09-15) is the latest outlook.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

Positive. E03 is the same entity as E02 (same LEI), and A09 (2025-09-15) set the outlook to POS.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

Positive, going by the latest action (A09, 2025-09-15). E02 shows Stable (A08, 2023), but E03 shares E02's LEI and conflicts with it, so the record is ambiguous.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

Positive, but ambiguous. E03 (same LEI as E02) has the latest action, A09 (2025-09-15, AF, POS), while E02's last action (A08, 2023) shows STA.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

POS. The latest action on Northwind Holdings is A09 (2025-09-15, on E03) with a positive outlook. E02 shows STA from 2023 (A08), but E02 and E03 share an LEI, so the later record appears to supersede it.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

POS, but the data conflicts. E02's last RATINGS action is STA (A08, 2023). E03, a RESEARCH record with the same LEI, shows POS (A09, 2025-09-15), which I've taken as most recent.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

POS, per the latest action (A09, 2025-09-15, affirmed A, outlook POS) on E03. E03 shares LEI 213800PHEIYNJMHTDV74 with E02, whose last recorded outlook is STA (A08, 2023). This is a conflict between the two records.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

Positive. E02's current LTIDR FC rating of A (A09, from 2025-09-15) carries outlook POS.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

Positive (POS). E02's current LTIDR is A with outlook POS from 2025-09-15 (A09).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

Positive. E02's LTIDR FC A outlook POS has been in force since 2025-09-15 (A09).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

POS (Positive). E02's LTIDR FC outlook is POS from 2025-09-15, still open (A09).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

Positive. Northwind Holdings' rating A (A09) has outlook POS and no end date.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 1 graded by code

Positive (POS). The latest action on Northwind Holdings is the affirmation of A with a Positive outlook (A09, E03, which is the same entity as E02).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 2 graded by code

POS (Positive). E03 is the same entity as E02 (same LEI), and the latest outlook is set by A09 (2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 3 graded by code

Positive (POS). Northwind Holdings (E02; E03 is the same LEI) was affirmed on 2025-09-15 with outlook POS (A09), the latest action.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 4 graded by code

Positive (POS)
The latest action on Northwind Holdings (E02/E03, same LEI) is the 2025-09-15 affirmation of A with a POS outlook (A09).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 5 graded by code

Positive. E03 is the same LEI as E02, and its latest action (A09, 2025-09-15) sets the outlook to POS.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 1 graded by code

Positive (POS). Northwind Holdings' latest action is A09 (E03, same LEI as E02), which carries outlook POS.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 2 graded by code

Positive. Northwind Holdings' current record is E03 (A09, affirmed 2025-09-15), which shares LEI with E02, and it carries outlook POS.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 3 graded by code

Positive. E02 (Northwind Holdings) and E03 (same LEI, RESEARCH record) share one entity, and the latest action, A09 (affirmed A, 2025-09-15), has outlook POS.

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 4 graded by code

Positive. Northwind Holdings' A rating was affirmed on 2025-09-15 under record E03, which is the same entity as E02 (same LEI), with outlook POS (A09).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 5 graded by code

POS
Northwind's current outlook comes from A09 (affirmed A, Positive), which is recorded on E03, the same legal entity as E02 (same LEI).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 1 graded by code

Positive. E02 and E03 are the same entity (same LEI), and its latest action is A09 (affirmed A, outlook POS, 2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 2 graded by code

Positive. Northwind Holdings is E02 and E03 (same LEI), and the latest outlook is POS from A09 (2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 3 graded by code

Positive. E02 and E03 share an LEI, and the latest outlook is POS from A09 (2025-09-15).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 4 graded by code

POS. E02's latest action is A09 on its duplicate record E03 (affirmed, outlook Positive).

JSON: {"outlook": "POS"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 5 graded by code

Positive. E02's latest outlook is POS from A09 (2025-09-15), which was recorded against E03, the same entity as E02 (same LEI).

JSON: {"outlook": "Positive"}