Q21, run 2026-11-05-1233-haiku

← back to the run

Which entities had an issuer rating at some point but no longer had one on 1 October 2026?

Tests: Withdrawals: a withdrawn rating is no rating.

Expected: entities = ['E07']

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

E07. It had a rating until it was withdrawn (A19).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn (A19) and it has no later rating. No other entity with a rating history lost its rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn (A19), so it had no issuer rating on 1 Oct 2026.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

E07. It had an LTIDR (A18) and was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). E11 has only a CO record, and VD has only a CC record, so neither is an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

E07. It had a rating (A18) that was withdrawn (A19).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

E07, whose rating was withdrawn (A19). E11 and VD have only non-issuer types (CO and CC), so I did not count them.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

E07
E07 had a rating (A18) that was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). No other entity lost its issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

E07. A19 withdrew its rating, so it no longer holds one. E11's only rating (A46) is type CO, which the data does not define, so I did not count it as an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

E07, which was rated until its withdrawal (A19, 2026-05-12).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

E07. It had a rating that was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). E11 and VD have only CO and Country Ceiling records, which are not issuer ratings.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

E07
E07 had a BB rating (A18) and was then withdrawn (A19), so it no longer holds an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

E07. It had ratings (A18) and was withdrawn (A19). E11 and the Republic of Valdoria never had an issuer rating (A46 is a credit opinion and A12 a ceiling).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

**E07.** It had a BB rating (A18) and was withdrawn (A19). E11 never had an issuer rating (only a credit opinion, A46).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

E07
E07 had a BB rating (A18) and was withdrawn (A19, 2026-05-12). No other entity lost its issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

E07. It had an LTIDR (A18) that was withdrawn (A19). Sovereign VD holds only a Country Ceiling, which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

E07. Pellam Retail had an issuer rating (BB, A18) that was withdrawn by A19 with no later rating. E11 and VD have never had an issuer rating (only a CO and a CC), so they do not qualify.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

Pellam Retail (E07). It held BB (A18) until A19 withdrew the rating on 2026-05-12. E11 and VD never held an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

E07 (Pellam Retail). It had a BB rating (A18) and was withdrawn (A19). E11 never had an issuer rating (only a CO) and VD has only a Country Ceiling.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

E07. It had a rating (A18, A19) and was withdrawn on 2026-05-12. E04, E11 and VD never had an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

E07. It held a rating until its withdrawal in A19. E11 and VD have never held an issuer rating, and E16 is a QA record.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19) and nothing replaced it. E11 holds only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

E07, which had a rating until its withdrawal (A19, 2026-05-12). E11 is excluded because its only action is a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

E07 (Pellam Retail). It was withdrawn (A19) and has no later rating. VD and E11 never held an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

E07. It had a rating (A18) and then a withdrawal (A19). E11 never had an issuer rating, since its CO (A46) is not one.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

Pellam Retail (E07), withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). Halden Leasing (E11) had a CO rating (A46), but the code is undefined, so I did not count it as an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

E07 (withdrawn by A19). Other entities that were once rated still have a current rating, and E11 and VD also have non-LTIDR ratings (CO and CC) that have not been withdrawn.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

E07. It had a rating (BB, A18) that was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

E07, whose rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). E04 and E11 never held an LTIDR, and VD has only a CC record.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn in A19, and every other entity with an LTIDR rating still has one.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn (A19), and no current issuer rating is recorded for it on 1 October 2026.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

E07. Its last rating is WD, so it has no active rating on 1 Oct 2026. This follows the Q9 treatment.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

E07. It had a BB rating (A18) that ended on 2026-05-12 and now carries WD (A19).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19), so it had a rating earlier (A18) but none on 1 October 2026.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

Pellam Retail (E07). It held BB (A18) until 2026-05-12, and its current record is WD (A19), so it has no active rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 1 graded by code

Pellam Retail (E07). It had a rating until it was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). Sovereign Valdoria (VD) had only a Country Ceiling, which is not an issuer rating, and E11 had only a credit opinion.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 2 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19) and it has had no issuer rating since. VD never had an issuer rating (only a Country Ceiling), and E04 and E11 never had one.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 3 graded by code

E07. Pellam Retail had a BB rating (A18) that was withdrawn (A19), so it no longer has one. Every other entity with an issuer rating still holds one, and E04, E11 and VD never had an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 4 graded by code

E07
Pellam had a BB rating (A18) that was withdrawn (A19). E11 and VD have never held an issuer rating (credit opinion and Country Ceiling only).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 5 graded by code

E07 (Pellam). Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). E11 never had an issuer rating (its CO isn't one).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 1 graded by code

E07 (Pellam Retail). It was rated BB (A18) until the 2026-05-12 withdrawal (A19). E16 is excluded as a QA record.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 2 graded by code

E07. Pellam had a BB issuer rating (A18) that was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). E16 is a test record, so it is excluded.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 3 graded by code

E07. Its issuer rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). E16 is excluded because it is a QA test record and is never an issuer. E11 never held an issuer rating (its only action is a credit opinion, A46).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 4 graded by code

E07. It had a BB rating (A18) that was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). E16 had issuer-type actions, but as a QA test record it is excluded from Issuer.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 5 graded by code

E07
E07 held an LTIDR (A18) that was withdrawn by A19 on 2026-05-12. E16 is excluded as a test record.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 1 graded by code

E07 (Pellam Retail). It held a BB rating (A18) and was withdrawn (A19) before 2026-10-01. Every other entity with an issuer rating still holds one.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 2 graded by code

E07. It had a BB rating (A18), which was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). No other entity lost its issuer rating; VD has only a ceiling and E11 has only a credit opinion.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 3 graded by code

E07. It held BB (A18) until it was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 4 graded by code

E07. It withdrew its only issuer rating (A19, 2026-05-12) and has no other issuer rating in force.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 5 graded by code

Pellam Retail (E07). Its rating was withdrawn in A19, and no other entity that once held an issuer rating lost it. The credit opinion for E11 (A46) and the ceiling for VD (A12) are not issuer ratings.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}