Q46, run 2026-11-05-1227-sonnet

← back to the run

Does Halden Leasing have an issuer rating?

Tests: Local type: a credit opinion (CO) is not a rating.

Expected: issuer_rating = no

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO-type rating (A46), not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a "CO" record (A46), whose meaning isn't defined, and no LTIDR.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a "CO" rating (A46), whose meaning the data doesn't define, and no LTIDR.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

No. E11 only has a "CO" rating (A46), not an LTIDR or STIDR, and the data doesn't define CO.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a "CO" rating (A46), whose meaning the data doesn't define, and no LTIDR.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO-type rating (A46), not an issuer default rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 2 graded by code

No. E11 only has a CO-type rating (A46) and no LTIDR. The data doesn't define CO.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a "CO" rating (A46) and no LTIDR.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 4 graded by code

No. E11's only rating is a CO-type rating (A46), not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R2 rdf run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO-type rating (A46), not a long-term or short-term issuer default rating. The meaning of CO is not defined.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a Credit Opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R6 rdf+ontology run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, type CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO record (A46), not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a "CO" type rating (A46), which the data doesn't define. It has no LTIDR.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO-type rating (A46), not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a "CO" record (A46), not an LTIDR, and the data doesn't define CO.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R3 csv+padding run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a "CO" record (A46), which is not an issuer rating type; I05 is supported by guarantor E10.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has no issuer rating, only the guaranteed instrument I05, which takes E10's credit risk.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has no rating record of its own; I05 is rated on E10's credit risk.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has no issuer rating of its own; I05 is rated through its guarantor.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has no rating records; I05 is rated through its guarantor E10.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R10 executed run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has no rating of its own. I05 is rated, but that rating reflects the guarantor E10.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 2 graded by code

No. E11 only has a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}