Q19, run 2026-11-05-1227-sonnet
Which issuers had a Negative outlook on 1 October 2026?
Tests: Outlooks: set by affirmations, without a rating change.
Expected: issuers = ['E01', 'E09']
csv run 1
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv run 2
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv run 3
E01 and E09 (A03, A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv run 4
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv run 5
E01 and E09, from A03 and A25.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
rdf run 1
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
rdf run 2
E01 and E09. Their latest outlooks are Negative (A03, A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
rdf run 3
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25). E06's last stated outlook was STA, and its A17 record carries no outlook.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
rdf run 4
E01 and E09 (A03, A25). E06 is on watch, with no outlook recorded.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
rdf run 5
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
rdf+ontology run 1
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
rdf+ontology run 2
E01 and E09. Their latest actions carry a Negative outlook (A03, A25). E06's Watch action (A17) states no outlook.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
rdf+ontology run 3
E01 and E09, from A03 and A25 respectively.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
rdf+ontology run 4
E01 and E09. They were affirmed with a Negative outlook in A03 and A25.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
rdf+ontology run 5
E01 and E09, from A03 and A25. E06's outlook is not restated in A17, and its last stated outlook was stable.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+ontology run 1
E01 and E09. A03 and A25 set a Negative outlook, and nothing later changes it.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+ontology run 2
E01 and E09. Their latest actions, A03 and A25, both carry a NEG outlook.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+ontology run 3
E01 and E09 (A03 and A25). E06's A17 leaves the outlook blank, so I did not count it.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+ontology run 4
E01 and E09, from A03 and A25.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+ontology run 5
E01 and E09. Their latest actions, A03 and A25, both carry NEG outlooks.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+markdown run 1
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+markdown run 2
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25). E06's latest action (A17) shows no outlook, so I have not counted it.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+markdown run 3
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25). E02/E03 has a Positive outlook.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+markdown run 4
E01 and E09 (A03 and A25 carry a negative outlook). E06's latest action, A17, has no outlook recorded, so I excluded it.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+markdown run 5
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+padding run 1
E01 and E09 (A03, A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+padding run 2
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+padding run 3
E01 and E09 (A03, A25). E06's A17 carries no outlook, and its last stated outlook was Stable (A16).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+padding run 4
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+padding run 5
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
executed run 1
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
executed run 2
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
executed run 3
Kestrel Energy (E01, A03) and Halden Group (E09, A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
executed run 4
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
executed run 5
E01 and E09 (A03, A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+neutral run 1
E01 and E09. A03 and A25 are their latest actions and both carry a NEG outlook.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+neutral run 2
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+neutral run 3
E01 and E09, from A03 and A25. E06's A17 has no outlook value, so it cannot be counted as Negative.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+neutral run 4
E01 and E09 (A03 and A25 both carry NEG). E06's A17 carries no outlook, so I did not count it.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+neutral run 5
E01 and E09. Their latest outlooks are NEG (A03 and A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+axioms run 1
E01 and E09. A03 and A25 carry a Negative outlook. A17 has no outlook.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+axioms run 2
E01 and E09 (A03, A25). A17 carries no outlook.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+axioms run 3
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25). A17 gives E06 no outlook.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+axioms run 4
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+axioms run 5
E01 and E09, from A03 and A25.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+axioms+markdown run 1
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25). E06's A17 carries no outlook, so I have not counted it.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+axioms+markdown run 2
E01 and E09, from A03 and A25 (both NEG). E06's latest action A17 carries no outlook, so I have not counted it.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+axioms+markdown run 3
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25).
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+axioms+markdown run 4
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25). E06's latest action A17 gives no outlook, so I don't count it as Negative.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}
csv+axioms+markdown run 5
E01 (A03) and E09 (A25). The latest actions on E06 and E08 carry no outlook.
JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}