Q46, run 2026-11-04-2028-haiku

← back to the run

Does Halden Leasing have an issuer rating?

Tests: Local type: a credit opinion (CO) is not a rating.

Expected: issuer_rating = no

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO rating (A46, BBB), which is not an LTIDR issuer rating. The CO code is undefined, so a different reading would change this answer.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has no LTIDR. Its only record is a CO action (A46), and CO is not defined as an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has no LTIDR. Its only rating is a BBB record of undefined type "CO" (A46).

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

❌ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

Depends. The only rating is a CO rating of BBB (A46), and CO is not defined as an issuer rating. There is no LTIDR.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "depends"}

Why: issuer_rating: expected no, got depends

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO record (A46), not an LTIDR issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

No
E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which the ontology says is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (CO, A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which the ontology says must never be counted as a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. E11's only record is a credit opinion (A46, CO), which the ontology says is never an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing has only a Credit Opinion (CO, A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is never counted as a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 4 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 5 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a credit opinion, A46 (CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}