Q19, run 2026-11-04-2028-haiku

← back to the run

Which issuers had a Negative outlook on 1 October 2026?

Tests: Outlooks: set by affirmations, without a rating change.

Expected: issuers = ['E01', 'E09']

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

E01 and E09. Their latest outlooks are NEG (A03, A25). The other entities show STA or POS.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

E01 (NEG, A03, 2026-02-10) and E09 (NEG, A25, 2026-03-01). No later actions changed either outlook.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

E01 and E09. These are the only entities with a NEG outlook (A03, A25) and no later outlook change.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

E01 and E09. Their latest outlooks are NEG (A03, A25), and no later outlook change is recorded for either.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

E01 (A03) and E09 (A25). Every other issuer's latest outlook is Stable or Positive, or blank.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

E01, E09
A03 (E01) and A25 (E09) are the latest outlook settings, both NEG.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

E01 and E09. E01's latest outlook is NEG (A03), and E09's is NEG (A25).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

E01 and E09. A03 (NEG) and A25 (NEG) are the latest outlook-setting actions for those issuers.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

E01 and E09. Their latest LTIDR actions are A03 (NEG) and A25 (NEG). E06's latest action (A17) has no outlook, so it is not Negative.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

E01 and E09. Their latest long-term actions, A03 and A25, both carry a Negative outlook.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

E01 (A03, NEG) and E09 (A25, NEG).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

E01 and E09. Kestrel's last outlook is Negative (A03) and Halden Group's is Negative (A25). The other entities are Stable or Positive.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

E01 and E09. Both have NEG outlooks on their latest LTIDR actions (A03 and A25). E02 is POS, and the other outlooks are STA or blank.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

E01 (Kestrel Energy, A03) and E09 (Halden Group, A25). Both have a Negative outlook that has not been revised since.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

E01 and E09. Their latest explicit outlooks are A03 (NEG) and A25 (NEG). E06 and E08 have blank outlooks in their latest actions, but their last explicit outlooks are Stable, so neither is Negative.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 1 graded by code

E01 and E09. A03 (E01) and A25 (E09) are the in-force Negative outlooks.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 2 graded by code

E01 and E09. E01 (A03) and E09 (A25) carry NEG outlooks. E06's latest action (A17) has no outlook recorded.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 3 graded by code

E01 and E09. Their NEG outlooks in A03 and A25 are still in force.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 4 graded by code

E01 and E09. Their current LTIDRs carry NEG: A03 for E01 and A25 for E09.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 5 graded by code

E01 and E09. Their LTIDRs A03 (BBB) and A25 (A) both carry outlook NEG and nothing later supersedes them.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}