Q46, run 2026-11-04-2013-sonnet

← back to the run

Does Halden Leasing have an issuer rating?

Tests: Local type: a credit opinion (CO) is not a rating.

Expected: issuer_rating = no

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a CO record (A46), not an LTIDR or STIDR.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

No. E11 only has a "CO" record (A46), which is not an issuer rating type.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

No. E11 only has a "CO" record (A46), which is not an issuer rating type (LTIDR/STIDR), and CO is undefined in the data.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a "CO" row (A46), not an LTIDR or STIDR.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

No. E11 only has a "CO" type action (A46), which is not an issuer rating type.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R4 csv+markdown run 5 graded by code

No. E11 only has a credit opinion (A46), which is not a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 2 graded by code

No. E11 has only a Credit Opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 4 graded by code

No. E11 only has a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}