Q21, run 2026-11-04-1824-haiku

← back to the run

Which entities had an issuer rating at some point but no longer had one on 1 October 2026?

Tests: Withdrawals: a withdrawn rating is no rating.

Expected: entities = ['E07']

✅ R1 csv run 1 graded by code

E07. Its ratings were withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19), and no later rating exists.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R1 csv run 2 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). E11 has a CO rating, which I do not treat as an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R1 csv run 3 graded by code

E07. Its LTIDR was withdrawn in A19 (2026-05-12). No other entity with a rating has lost it.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R1 csv run 4 graded by code

E07 (Pellam Retail). It was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). No other entity lost its rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R1 csv run 5 graded by code

E07. Its LTIDR was withdrawn by A19 (2026-05-12) and not reinstated.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19), so it no longer has a rating. E11 holds only a credit opinion, which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

E07. It had an issuer rating (A18) until its withdrawal (A19). E11 never held an issuer rating, having only a credit opinion (A46).

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). VD and E11 have a ceiling and a credit opinion respectively, which are not issuer ratings.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

E07.
E07 had a BB rating (A18) and was withdrawn (A19), so it had no rating on 1 Oct 2026.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

E07. It had a rating (A18) and was withdrawn (A19). E11 never had an issuer rating, and the sovereigns only have Country Ceilings.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 1 graded by code

E07. Pellam's issuer rating ended with the withdrawal on 2026-05-12 (A19). E16 is excluded because QA records never meet the in-force condition.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 2 graded by code

E07
E07 had an issuer rating (A18, BB) that was withdrawn (A19). E16 had LTIDR actions, but as a QA test record it is excluded from the Issuer class.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 3 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). E11 never had an issuer rating (only a credit opinion), and E16 is a QA record.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 4 graded by code

E07
E07 had an issuer rating (A18, BB) that was withdrawn in May 2026 (A19). E16 is excluded as a QA test record.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R8 csv+axioms run 5 graded by code

E07. It had LTIDR ratings (A18) but was withdrawn (A19). E16 is excluded because it is a QA test record.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 1 graded by code

E07. Pellam Retail had a rating that was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). Halden Leasing (E11) and Northwind Finance (E04) never had an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 2 graded by code

E07. It had a BB issuer rating (A18) that was withdrawn (A19). E11 and VD never held an issuer rating.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 3 graded by code

E07. It had an issuer rating (A18) and was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). Every other entity with an issuer rating still has one on 1 Oct 2026.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 4 graded by code

E07. Its rating was withdrawn on 2026-05-12 (A19). E11 never had an issuer rating (only a credit opinion), and E16 is QA.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}

✅ R9 csv+axioms+markdown run 5 graded by code

E07
E07 held an issuer rating (BB, A18) and was withdrawn in 2026 (A19). E11 never held an issuer rating, because its only rating is a credit opinion.

JSON: {"entities": ["E07"]}