Q46, run 2026-11-04-1723-haiku

← back to the run

Does Halden Leasing have an issuer rating?

Tests: Local type: a credit opinion (CO) is not a rating.

Expected: issuer_rating = no

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a credit opinion (A46), and the ontology says a CO is never an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

No. Halden Leasing (E11) has only a credit opinion (A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a Credit Opinion (A46), and the ontology says a credit opinion is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, type CO), which is never an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 1 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 2 graded by code

No. E11's only record is a credit opinion (CO, A46), which is not an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 3 graded by code

No. E11 has only a Credit Opinion (A46), which the ontology says is never an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 4 graded by code

No. E11 has only a credit opinion (A46), which the ontology says is never an issuer rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 5 graded by code

No.
E11 has only a credit opinion (A46, CO), which is never counted as a rating.

JSON: {"issuer_rating": "no"}