Q19, run 2026-11-04-1723-haiku

← back to the run

Which issuers had a Negative outlook on 1 October 2026?

Tests: Outlooks: set by affirmations, without a rating change.

Expected: issuers = ['E01', 'E09']

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 1 graded by code

E01 and E09. A03 (NEG) and A25 (NEG) are the latest stated outlooks, and every other entity's latest stated outlook is STA or POS.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 2 graded by code

E01 and E09. Their latest outlook settings are NEG (A03 and A25). E06's latest action leaves the outlook blank, so no negative outlook is recorded for it.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 3 graded by code

E01 (A03, NEG) and E09 (A25, NEG). No other issuer's latest explicit outlook is Negative.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 4 graded by code

E01 (A03, NEG) and E09 (A25, NEG).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R5 csv+ontology run 5 graded by code

E01 (NEG, A03) and E09 (NEG, A25). E01's later STIDR action (A04) is a different rating type and does not change its LTIDR outlook.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 1 graded by code

E01 (NEG, A03) and E09 (NEG, A25). No other issuer's latest outlook is NEG.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 2 graded by code

E01 (NEG, A03) and E09 (NEG, A25).

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 3 graded by code

E01 and E09. Their latest outlooks are NEG (A03, A25). E06's last explicit outlook is STA (A16) and E08's is STA (A20), so neither is negative.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 4 graded by code

E01 (A03, NEG) and E09 (A25, NEG). Both are the latest outlook-setting actions on their FC issuer ratings.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}

✅ R7 csv+neutral run 5 graded by code

E01, E09.
A03 (E01) and A25 (E09) set NEG, and no later action on either changes the outlook.

JSON: {"issuers": ["E01", "E09"]}